Woah woah woah.....
Hold the phone guys. What I meant was that in that show, they were looking for the super punch (ie the one that hit the hardest in one go).
As I mentioned, I prefer a wing chun punch, not for power but the reasons I stated. Firstly, it attacks the centre line so the damage area will be more confined. Secondly, it is very easy to launch a wing chun punch (ie you could do 40 punches and not feel very tired) - a hook involves a lot more effort. Thirdly, you can perform the wing chun punch from a very short range (from a clinch), whereas it is difficult with a hook (especially if you're in a good clinch). Lastly, you are driving your body through a straight line. Whilst it won't give you the blunt force trauma that a boxers punch would, it goes deep into the body and the organs (imagine a spear that you can't stop digging into you)
A big flaw in wing chun is the footwork. A lot of chunners are too rigid and it can be too slow, especially if you are trying to keep up with a boxer, MT guy, capoira guy, etc
In Kamon, we attempt to move with flexibility, waiting for the time to hit before we use arrow walk, huen bo footwork etc.
A hook is a good punch and there is no disputing that. I have been knocked out/caught out many times with tight hooks. But I have been caught out a lot more from a wing chun punch.
Medic06 - thanks for the compliment, but it is not that much of an impressive resume compared to a lot of people. I am always willing to listen to counter arguments against any of my posts, but I tend to get one liners from ThaiBri, yourself and several others, which doesn't really progress the discussion
If you guys have a point (that isn't just designed to bash wing chun!) then share it because discussion is good.
Hold the phone guys. What I meant was that in that show, they were looking for the super punch (ie the one that hit the hardest in one go).
As I mentioned, I prefer a wing chun punch, not for power but the reasons I stated. Firstly, it attacks the centre line so the damage area will be more confined. Secondly, it is very easy to launch a wing chun punch (ie you could do 40 punches and not feel very tired) - a hook involves a lot more effort. Thirdly, you can perform the wing chun punch from a very short range (from a clinch), whereas it is difficult with a hook (especially if you're in a good clinch). Lastly, you are driving your body through a straight line. Whilst it won't give you the blunt force trauma that a boxers punch would, it goes deep into the body and the organs (imagine a spear that you can't stop digging into you)
A big flaw in wing chun is the footwork. A lot of chunners are too rigid and it can be too slow, especially if you are trying to keep up with a boxer, MT guy, capoira guy, etc
In Kamon, we attempt to move with flexibility, waiting for the time to hit before we use arrow walk, huen bo footwork etc.
A hook is a good punch and there is no disputing that. I have been knocked out/caught out many times with tight hooks. But I have been caught out a lot more from a wing chun punch.
Medic06 - thanks for the compliment, but it is not that much of an impressive resume compared to a lot of people. I am always willing to listen to counter arguments against any of my posts, but I tend to get one liners from ThaiBri, yourself and several others, which doesn't really progress the discussion
If you guys have a point (that isn't just designed to bash wing chun!) then share it because discussion is good.
Comment