Originally posted by jmd161
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why I don't practice BJJ
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by TigerClaw View PostI wouldn't say ,"Most", until you have met most of them. There are thousands of true sifus all over the world and i think we need to be careful of painting with too big a brush. Many of the best fighters in KUng Fu, you will never see. Especially on you tube although you can see some of them.
I agree with you not being able to find many of the real deal guys because they don't want all the attention. Or the headaches associated with dealing with kung fu today.
jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by jubaji View PostOk, so where are all these kungfu folks beating the snot out of everyone outside of sport?
Originally posted by jmd161 View PostI'm really starting to question the level of experience and skill of some of the so called experienced kung fu stylist on this forum. They make the same argument as a novice kung fu stylist. We are supposed to believe They can pull off killer techniques, when they can't even fight without striking the throat, eyes or groin?
This is what I mean about people trying to argue for kung fu and making it look even more foolish. To say you can't fight without striking those areas shows that this person has no experience in using their kung fu as well as actual fighting experience. I agree kung fu was not created for sport, but real combat, but not every strike within kung fu are "The Deadly" like many kung fu stylist want you to believe. I'll help your argument by admitting that the rules within MMA eliminate many techniques that kung fu favor, but that doesn't mean the kung fu stylist is now weaponless.
What it does show is that too many of you rely on just a handful of so called finishing techniques that you have never even attempted, to base your fighting off. This is the biggest problem with kung fu people... thinking they can pull off throat strikes, eye pokes and groin attacks in a combat situation, when they can't even throw a proper punch in a sport situation. Too many believe they can win with techniques they've never tried, and find out when they reach for these same techniques they aren't nearly as easy to pull off as they thought. jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by jmd161 View PostI'm really starting to question the level of experience and skill of some of the so called experienced kung fu stylist on this forum. They make the same argument as a novice kung fu stylist. We are supposed to believe They can pull off killer techniques, when they can't even fight without striking the throat, eyes or groin?
This is what I mean about people trying to argue for kung fu and making it look even more foolish. To say you can't fight without striking those areas shows that this person has no experience in using their kung fu as well as actual fighting experience. I agree kung fu was not created for sport, but real combat, but not every strike within kung fu are "The Deadly" like many kung fu stylist want you to believe. I'll help your argument by admitting that the rules within MMA eliminate many techniques that kung fu favor, but that doesn't mean the kung fu stylist is now weaponless.
What it does show is that too many of you rely on just a handful of so called finishing techniques that you have never even attempted, to base your fighting off. This is the biggest problem with kung fu people... thinking they can pull off throat strikes, eye pokes and groin attacks in a combat situation, when they can't even throw a proper punch in a sport situation. Too many believe they can win with techniques they've never tried, and find out when they reach for these same techniques they aren't nearly as easy to pull off as they thought.
jeff
You’ve hit the nail on the coffin. I think if kung-fu practitioners exhibited the kind of attitude and thinking you display, they would be helping their cause further. Thank for the great insight!
Actually, the idea of “illegal” and “deadly” techniques has been addressed by BJJers for some time. The answer to this problem lies within BJJ’s core principle; positional dominance. In BJJ, positional dominance is everything. For when you can control your opponent’s position and dominate him, it negates most of his momentum, space and ability to effectively hurt you.
For instance, let’s say I’m faced with someone who wants to eye gouge me. To reach my eyes, he needs to be within striking range; which also happens to be the range where I can take him down. The moment he gets into range to eye gouge, I change levels and go for the takedown and attain mount or side control. However, let’s say he waits for the counter attack. I close the distance and change levels, taking way his angle to eye gouge; I get the takedown anyway.
From underneath mount or side control, the eye gouger has very little opportunity or space to launch his attack. But the real question is, “who is in a better position to launch their attack; the person who is in control or the one who has lost it?” But suppose he is able to eye gouge me from the bottom position… From my superior position, I would just inflict more pain and punishment in retaliation. In any case, I highly doubt this would be the case.
If you’ve never been under a good mount or side control (especially in an MMA context) you’re at the mercy of the person on top. Not only are you suffocating and depleting energy, you’re taking heavy shots. When you’re taking massive blows from the top where he has gravity on his side, are you really going go for the eye gouge, phoenix eye fist to the temple, pressure point attack, etc?… Very unlikely. If you do, you’re a dead man. Your first objective should be to defend your position, then find a way out.
Can deadly and illegal techniques have an impact in a fight? Yes, of course they can change things… But their chances of success are minimal when faced with a system designed to neutralize their effectiveness.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JadeDragon View PostI'm not saying that kung fu practitioners can't fight without using these lethal strikes. What I am saying is that if needed they can use them. It would be like telling a jujitsu stylist that he can't use a rear naked choke or an arm bar when fighting. A LOT of the techniques used in kung fu are to vital areas such as the throat, temple, eyes, and groin. I'm not going to go for those areas specifically but its nice to know that I have that option if need be. In sporting events those targets are not allowed but in real life they are allowed since there are no rules. That's why kung fu stylists will get beat in the ring but stand a better chance on the street. And yes kung fu stylists can get beat on the streets, I'm not saying they can't. But once again I go back to my arguments that it's the fighters skill not the art he practices that makes the fighter.
Also, the student them self needs to go out and attempt to work what they are learning. You can go to any MMA gym and find guys willing to exchange with you on a friendly level. Put on the gloves and try some of your so called techniques and see, if you can in fact pull any off.
jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by JadeDragon View PostI'm not saying that kung fu practitioners can't fight without using these lethal strikes. What I am say is that if needed they can use them. It would be like telling a jiu jitsu stylist that he can't use a rear naked choke or an arm bar when fighting. .
Originally posted by JadeDragon View PostALOT of the techniques used in kung fu are to vital areas such as the throat, temple, eyes, and groin. I'm not going to go for those areas specifically but its nice to know that I have that option if need be..
Originally posted by JadeDragon View PostAnd yes kung fu stylists can get beat on the streets, I'm not saying they can't. But once again I go back to my arguement that it's the fighters skill not the art he practices that makes the fighter.
The same can be said of Maeda, the predecessor of Gracie Jiu-jitsu. Maeda was also a man of small stature, yet he was able to defeat men in different weight classes around the world. Also, more recently, Yuki Nakai, was seen in the film “Choke” to reach the finals after defeating top kick boxers and fighters in a no-weight limit tournament in Japan. Nakai weighed at only 130 lbs and used grappling to defeat men who weighed over 200 lbs!
These examples of overcoming extreme disadvantages are quite common in BJJ. Yet, they don’t exist as often outside. That, my friend, says a lot about the system of BJJ.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JadeDragon View PostAnd that can be said for grapplers as well.
No, grapplers usually refer to competitions and the like to demonstrate the fact that they can do what they claim to do. Kungfu LARPers like you rely ONLY on unverifiable claims, often in 'imaginative' ways (see tigerclown).
Comment
-
Originally posted by jubaji View PostNo, grapplers usually refer to competitions and the like to demonstrate the fact that they can do what they claim to do. Kungfu LARPers like you rely ONLY on unverifiable claims, often in 'imaginative' ways (see tigerclown).
How about this.....I publically state that if the user known as Jubaji beats me and injures me I will not press charges on him. I do hereby solemely swear i will not hold him liable for any injuries that might occur to me due to us fighting.
Now, put up or shut up. The ball is in your court now. There is nothing more I can say or do.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jubaji View PostGive it a rest, Fire Chief. If you think you are worth the trouble of crossing the street to spit on, you are overestimating yourself by half. If you are so eager to have your head planted into the ground I'm sure you can find someone local to help you out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jubaji View PostThat makes no sense. The inbreeding is kicking in again, isn't it?
If I'm not worth it then you would just ignore me and go on but apparentely I am worth it because you just have to keep on and on and on. And I knew you couldn't resist responding to me. Face it Jubanji, I control you. I own you.
Comment
Comment