Da Pope, he is pretending he is so skilled in "non-traditional kendo" that he can avoid strikes Crouching Tiger style. Or maybe he's being deliberately obtuse. Of course you would ideally strike first, but in reality this is not always the case. If you develope a "AW CRAP!!!" mentality every time things don't go your way in a conflict (as is usually the case with compliant "conducive to learning" techniques), your setting yourself up. By stepping outside your comfort zone and training with different certified instructors you can easily see the holes in your theories. Debating on forums and pretending to be an expert won't do it.
Could you ask him what non-traditional kendo is for me? He's not talking to me anymore. I'd like to know where he gets this from.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Abir Warrior Arts
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Da Pope View PostIn response maybe you need to do a bit more basic physics : Angular velocity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostWhat are you using to swing the sword with again?
In response maybe you need to do a bit more basic physics : Angular velocity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Da Pope View Post
Swords when used well move FAST, faster than you can move your body.
What are you using to swing the sword with again?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostI think you are falling into the drill trap of what we call "chasing"
When you do a drill enough times you recognize eventually where your opponent will be. When doing it at a speed that is conducive to learning if th instructors aren't watching careful, students will chase the other person, instead of following the path of what would be a commited attack.
If someone launches an actual "Imma f*ck you up" downward strike with any object, be it fist sword or wtf ever, and they commit, and you aren't "where you're supposed to be, then they miss.
That's why getting off centerline is so important. If the person has commited to the strike you will know where they will be, however they will be striking t air.
Hence it nullifies blocking. If the guys is trying to split you down the middle and you side step while he is commited you have an open shot. There is no need to claim "perfect scenario", you just have to understand basic physics.
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion.
People can call BS all they want, but if you train any weapon art with a worthwhile instructor you'll see this line of thought.
People who charge up the middle tend not to alleviate the damage they take in fights.
I am aware of "chasing" and no thats not what I am refering to.
RE: basic physics
My blade is faster than your feet! Sure step out of the on-comming traffick but to do so without covering with your sword is just plain crazy IMO.
Swords when used well move FAST, faster than you can move your body.
Anybody with any skill will redirect or strike is such a manner that they allow themselves cover from your counter.
I dont see how sword clash can practically be avoided, it just seems a very strange attitude to have.
I would rather have a damaged weapon than a damaged body.
(FYI I am a trained mechanical and electrical engineer I am currently researching cardiac-mechanics......bluntly I know my physics!)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Da Pope View PostI get what you and KOTF are saying but that isnt always an option is it?
(Now for some what ifs...)
What if the attack on your person has already been launched?
Surely defensive counters (that may well be attacks as well) are important?
The flayling Rabbi is a good example. There is no way in hell I would aproach that without sword cover and I would expect contact.
When you do a drill enough times you recognize eventually where your opponent will be. When doing it at a speed that is conducive to learning if th instructors aren't watching careful, students will chase the other person, instead of following the path of what would be a commited attack.
If someone launches an actual "Imma f*ck you up" downward strike with any object, be it fist sword or wtf ever, and they commit, and you aren't "where you're supposed to be, then they miss.
That's why getting off centerline is so important. If the person has commited to the strike you will know where they will be, however they will be striking t air.
Hence it nullifies blocking. If the guys is trying to split you down the middle and you side step while he is commited you have an open shot. There is no need to claim "perfect scenario", you just have to understand basic physics.
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion.
People can call BS all they want, but if you train any weapon art with a worthwhile instructor you'll see this line of thought.
People who charge up the middle tend not to alleviate the damage they take in fights.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mellow View PostReal World - attack and hit first, screw blocking.
Blocking is your "Oh, Sh**!!!" move because that's your last resort for defense.
I get what you and KOTF are saying but that isnt always an option is it?
(Now for some what ifs...)
What if the attack on your person has already been launched?
Surely defensive counters (that may well be attacks as well) are important?
The flayling Rabbi is a good example. There is no way in hell I would aproach that without sword cover and I would expect contact.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostWhen you fight with sticks, are you trying to hit the other guys stick?
Or are you trying to hit the other guy?
If you are aiming for his stick then you would have to count on disarming him before you could hurt him.
Doesn't fall under conservation of energy or any realistic fighting practice I've seen, other than larping.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostI'm done discusing this with you.
You seem to like to pretend you want to talk, then you pick and chose pieces of what people say and make it sound like they said something different.
It has nothing to do with perfect scenarios. It's called fighting the way you train.
You have yet to even clue anyone in on how or what you train.
Comment however you want, I'm ignoring you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tokyo Kid View PostRegardless of what I assume about your videos, I think your perfect scenario theories would be thrown out the window as soon as the stuff hits the fan. I'm sure you would have come across this with non-compliant sparring.
You seem to like to pretend you want to talk, then you pick and chose pieces of what people say and make it sound like they said something different.
It has nothing to do with perfect scenarios. It's called fighting the way you train.
You have yet to even clue anyone in on how or what you train.
Comment however you want, I'm ignoring you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostThe same places you are taught to pass through when covering your lines are the same ones you pass through to attack the other person.
If you have gotten offline of the other person and you pass your weapon diagonally from right to left, their body or part of it will intercept your weapon.
You said you watched my vids. If you saw the ones on getting offline this would make sense.
Unless you just assumed it was crap, and people stand right in front of each other and just smash and hack away.
In which case I can understand your confusion.
Otherwise I just think you're being contrary just to be.
What exactly is non-traditional kendo, and who did you learn it from?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mellow View PostReal World - attack and hit first, screw blocking.
Blocking is your "Oh, Sh**!!!" move because that's your last resort for defense.
I got a few years of non-traditional Kendo.
And small Jin.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Da Pope View PostIdeal world - I am superman and can avoid any strike comming in.
Real world - oh shit I really should haver blocked that!
Well thats my experience anyway....
What experience of swordsmanship do you have KOTF?
Blocking is your "Oh, Sh**!!!" move because that's your last resort for defense.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tokyo Kid View Postso how do you cover?
The same places you are taught to pass through when covering your lines are the same ones you pass through to attack the other person.
If you have gotten offline of the other person and you pass your weapon diagonally from right to left, their body or part of it will intercept your weapon.
You said you watched my vids. If you saw the ones on getting offline this would make sense.
Unless you just assumed it was crap, and people stand right in front of each other and just smash and hack away.
In which case I can understand your confusion.
Otherwise I just think you're being contrary just to be.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kingoftheforest View PostYou can't have a flow drill if the firt person to swing hits the other person.
"Block" is in quotes here again. It's not so much teaching to block, I used the term for simplicities sake I guess it missed it's mark, as it is teaching the begginer specific lines to cover.
it doesn't have to be a sword fight. Most arts teach you stick first because it translates to so many othe things.
Sword, stick, staff, cane, umbrella, hell even a broom if it's handy.
I'm going to ignore all the other childish comments, since some people complain when others do it, during a mature conversation.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: