we dont use wooden dummies...we spar w each other....i suppose this is much more interactive...if there are no other people to spar w then we condition our arms by ourselves...uhm the only similarity is the shallow horse stance and thats about it...how we attack and defend are VERY diff....even the footwork...no vertical fists here in ngo cho kun...its an entirely diff art...i found someone from the net keeping on insisting about such similarities...but there actually isnt any....maybe there are somethings going on between the masters(as in exchanges of ideas etc)...ngo cho kun is an external almost brute force system blended w some bits of internal styles...wc on the otherhand is more akin to the internal schools....
short step? uhmmmm partly true...the 1st 3 katas are short step...once someone reaches the more advanced levels...the katas become more and more dynamic...can cover lots of grounds...and there are leaps too...mostly for evading purposes....
its WAS really popular in manila bec there were 2 dominant ngo cho masters here...namingly our Master Lo Yan Chu and master tan ka hong(bing kiam)...our 2nd generation master Lo King Hui was really popular in chinatown and i suppose thats on factor...another is that ngo cho kun is a native fukien martial art and manila has many fukienese expats...
i will be in shaolin temple for the annual expo in nov 12
short step? uhmmmm partly true...the 1st 3 katas are short step...once someone reaches the more advanced levels...the katas become more and more dynamic...can cover lots of grounds...and there are leaps too...mostly for evading purposes....
its WAS really popular in manila bec there were 2 dominant ngo cho masters here...namingly our Master Lo Yan Chu and master tan ka hong(bing kiam)...our 2nd generation master Lo King Hui was really popular in chinatown and i suppose thats on factor...another is that ngo cho kun is a native fukien martial art and manila has many fukienese expats...
i will be in shaolin temple for the annual expo in nov 12
Comment