Originally posted by sojobow
View Post
They were obviously making a comparison between two styles in unarmed combat. As soon as you bring weapons into it, it just becomes impossible to compare styles because it's about how good your weapon is rather than how good your style is. Sorry son, but if you came running at an armed SAS with your little folded steel katana, you're gunna be shot down. Now, should I then come to the conclusion that the australian army is the best martial arts system? The most practical to all given situations?
No.
You have the assess and evaluate styles on an equal plain, making comparisons with practical and consistent weapons. Now, the one weapon you're always going to have on you, and that is fundamentally the same for almost all human beings, is the human body. So yeah, with these constrients in mind, what makes Aikido a decent art comparable to BJJ. Muay Thai etc.
Oh, and Tom Yum, the 100 man kumite isn't complusory to grade, any of the upper belt gradings requires multiple rounds of kumite with different opponents, but the 50 man and 100 man kumite's are more of a huge honourary Kyokushin thing quite apart from belts. Only 16 people have ever completed a 100 man Kumite and 20 have completed a 50 man Kumite. Masutatsu Oyama (our founder) is the only person to do a 300 man kumite (over 3 days) though. That's tough

Comment