Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bruce Lee and his skill - statements by various people

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Rolf Clausnitzer, author of what is arguably the first ever English language book written & published on Wing Chun.

    "As far as my interest in self defence was concerned, I had previously done a year of Judo under a very impressive Filipino instructor. I had also done a little bit of boxing at school and privately with an American friend….Then came the mind blowing experience which was to confirm my interest in Wing Chun...

    One of his (Lee at 17, prior to leaving Hon Kong) favourite stunts was to stand on one leg and with the other fend off a number of "attackers", pivoting as required. His speed, balance, manoeuvrability, and control were such that it was almost impossible to close in on him without getting kicked….

    Bruce invited me to "spar" with him, assuring me that I wouldn't get hurt...
    He asked me to bring my arms in contact with his, turned his head through 180% so that he couldn't see me, and he gave me the go ahead to box, to go for his face and chest. I tried for what seemed like a minute to score, but he deflected and trapped every jab, hook, cross and uppercut I threw, and his fist kept ending up under my nose. I realise now that what he was doing to me was "blindfolded" Chi Sau of a very high order. From that moment on, I guess I was hooked.

    Not long after, I was privileged to see Bruce again, not face to face, but in action at the Hong Kong Inter School Boxing Championships. Ironically, his opponent just happened to be good old Gary Elms, one of my schoolmates...

    His bout with Bruce turned out to be the most amazing and bizarre boxing match I have ever seen and expect to see. I honestly believe that Gary did not land even one single scoring punch throughout the entire 3 x 1 minute rounds, with Bruce deflecting and taking all of Gary's punches on his arms.

    Gary was knocked down several times, but he was not knocked out (contrary to what has been reported in various articles and books!) and, even more surprisingly, he did not appear to be hurt or distressed. Each time he was floored, he would immediately jump back up. That's why the referee did not stop the fight.

    Notwithstanding Gary's extraordinary toughness, I was amazed to see him survive the bout in such good shape. It was not until later when I caught up with Frank that some sort of explanation emerged.

    Apparently, when Frank and his friends went to congratulate Bruce after the bout, Bruce was shaking his head and looking far from pleased with himself. His reply to Frank's obvious question was something along the lines of, "Damn it, I couldn't knock the guy out". His rationalisation was that the large (16oz?) gloves neutralised the intended, penetrating effect of tilting the wrist on impact, a practice common to many Wing Chun practitioners (I gather he abandoned this practice in later years).

    He reckoned that this force was not penetrating the padding and, in any case, Gary was already being propelled backwards from the pushing impact of the glove. He swore that he would continue training until he could achieve the penetration he wanted.

    He also had his sights set on Peter Burton, a stylish and hard punching boxer from St George's School (which was exclusively for the children of British Armed Forces personnel in Hong Kong), a much bigger and heavier competitor who had TKO'd his opponent in the second round.

    By the way, Frank and I met Peter (who turned out to be half German as well) at a party a few weeks later and we talked about Bruce, but it's unlikely that such a bout would ever have been approved because of the weight and size differences and, in any case, Bruce left for the USA a few months later to begin a new chapter in his amazing life..."



    About one year later:

    Early Lee Student -James DeMile: ...I was a heavyweight boxer in the Air Force. Over a four year period I had over a hundred fights and never lost one. I had a very big ego and perceived myself as the toughtest man alive. I was 5ft 10inches and weighted 225. I could knock a man out with either hand. Then I met a small 135 lb 5 ft 7 kid who believed his martial arts could beat anyone. I decided to explain the reality of fighting to him and proceded to show him what street fighting was all about. Needless to say I learned humility in about 5 seconds. He not only stopped me cold, but tied me up in such a way that he could hit me at will and the only thing I could do about it was... nothing. Later I reviewed all my previous skills, including boxing and threw all of it out as it was impractical against Bruce's skills.
    ...Most of the questions about Bruces fighting skills are asked by people who did not know him. Most of the answers are from people who either did not know him or related their answer how Bruce would have done in a tournament. Joe Lewis is very out front with his comments and yet he always compares Bruce to either his tournament days or some world champion. I really enjoy meeting these people and always look forward to giving my opinion on why Bruce was the best street fighter I ever knew. Not pound for pound, but against anyone in a street fight. I was never in a tournament and had many street fights and I have never seen anyone that I would have been scared to fight, regardless of their Belts and trophies. This goes for UFC and K1. I'm not saying I could beat all of them, I am just saying they are tough, but so what. People do not understand what Bruce did in a real fight. They relate his skills to the movies or JKD. No, that was martial arts. Fighting is survival. It is mean, ugly and stupid and someone can reall be hurt or killed. Bruce knew he could be hurt if he got hit, that is why he believed a street fight should not last over two seconds and his personal skills were designed for that attitde. I am very opinionated and willing to discuss with anyone my belief in why Bruce was the best fighter I ever knew. And I still feel that way, 42 years later.

    Comment


    • #62
      Its easier to knock someone out with gloves on that without, much easier.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Ghost View Post
        Its easier to knock someone out with gloves on that without, much easier.
        Just as "pushing" one's fist into a heavy bag during training is the mark of a rookie:


        Comment


        • #64
          yeah his punch bag work out leaves alot to be desired.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Ghost View Post
            yeah his punch bag work out leaves alot to be desired.
            Actually, I meant the opposite. He was training his punch, in the clip, as a finishing off blow, one punch knockout. This went hand in hand with his set-ups. It is this stuff about him I'm mostly fascinated by.

            Here's the science:

            Comment


            • #66
              yeah i know the science but hes not doing it the best way.
              TO make a knock out you want to rattle the brain in the skull.

              How would you shake a pea in a can? shake the can in and out fast? or throw it one way and leave it there then bring it back.
              The correct way to make a knockout is to put the punch in AND out fast. to allow maximum recoil and rock the brain to the back AND front.

              Comment


              • #67
                They're both effective. By the way, that was the wrong clip -that one featured what you've described. Surprised you didn't cathch that.

                My apologies. Here is the science behind the punch result Lee is training for on that bag, explained by some one who knows. It has a full commitment to it as is more a more thrust. Thanks for the feedback.

                Comment


                • #68
                  THe smash refers to his left uppercut/left hook.
                  Which he loads well and is famous for.
                  He uses the body mechanics i described of in and out fast.
                  Nothing to do with pushing or leaving the punch there. The way to make a knock out is fast in and fast out with deep penetration or going straight through the target in the case of a circular punch where there is no chance of rebound onto the glove as the glove has gone past.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Liberty,

                    I enjoyed your 11:08 PM post. I had not seen the description of the HK boxing matches before.

                    Thank you

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Ghost View Post
                      THe smash refers to his left uppercut/left hook.
                      Which he loads well and is famous for.
                      He uses the body mechanics i described of in and out fast.
                      Nothing to do with pushing or leaving the punch there. The way to make a knock out is fast in and fast out with deep penetration or going straight through the target in the case of a circular punch where there is no chance of rebound onto the glove as the glove has gone past.
                      Yes and no. Yes, Rudduck's is a left uppercut/left hook. But no he does not always go in and out fast, but rather linngers it there a moment, as Lee does his in the work out. Same principle as a side thrust kick, etc. Further, in the second clip, the striker does just the opposite of what you have described - he slams his strike out, momentarily leaving it out; knocking the individual out cold. Yes, it's a street encounter, and so forth. It's also JKD essence. No, I'm not saying the guy is a JKD guy, other than in that moment.

                      Anyway, have it your way. That's cool, really. We can't always see eye to eye. Sort of like debating who was the greatest boxer of all time. Not everyone, even amongst skilled boxers, will agree it was Sugar Ray Robinson, for example (my personal pick). Sort of like debating anything, for that matter.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Ghost View Post
                        Its easier to knock someone out with gloves on that without, much easier.
                        Actually, padding in boxing gloves DOES absorb away much of the hurt and force than punching with the fist itself. I used gloves before, and yes, they added weight to my fists, giving it a bigger push when punching, but not as damaging as without gloves. I could hit the person away, but couldn't give him enough pain in his forehead or nose or chin or anywhere for that matter. Well, maybe I lack serious power, but I really believe gloves hinder. However, I'm not sure if it's cos the gloves were a little loose. They were worn out pairs shared by all students (my hands stunk like hell after every use).

                        Liberty, THANKS again, for the awesome post. But you're right, no one can agree on everything.. however, for your age, you're very well-researched. But I guess on Bruce Lee's fighting ability, no matter how much research we can throw out, there will always be people talking against it. They'll illustrate bits here and there to discount Bruce Lee, but you'll see that seldom they can dissect the statements of the people giving the accounts. Like James Demile, or Taky, or many others who've mentioned Bruce could fight because they've either tested him or seen him in fights, unless someone dares to come out and openly call these masters liars, I'll choose to believe these old-timers who knew Bruce personally.

                        But one other thing.. just a thought. If the HK tournament thing was true, about Bruce Lee being unable to knock Elms out until the third round, then Bruce would have had serious trouble beating Ali, Don't get me wrong. I STILL believe Bruce could fight, and fight very well too, but if we compare Ali to Gary Elms... you know what I mean?

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          You are forgeting that Bruce was just a high school student at the time. I do not think that anyone has sugested that a high school student could take out the world champ

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by lucidmist View Post
                            ...But one other thing.. just a thought. If the HK tournament thing was true, about Bruce Lee being unable to knock Elms out until the third round, then Bruce would have had serious trouble beating Ali, Don't get me wrong. I STILL believe Bruce could fight, and fight very well too, but if we compare Ali to Gary Elms... you know what I mean?
                            Although I'm sure the Clay (Ali) of 18 or so (born 1-17-42) would've dusted the Lee of that age, you're comparing that Lee, at 17 -18, rather then the Lee of, say, about the last 8 years before his death (Rip). The Lee who was so obssessed with Ali (as to what he might pick up) that he was said to spend entire days playing Ali films against a mirror (so they'd reflect back southpaw, as Lee preferred), while moving with Ali; impersonating him, reacting Ali's reactions, and so forth. This role "modeling," being as, when done right, results in the same neuro-transmissions in the modeler as it does the model, could not but allow Lee access into Ali's mind! If you've ever been so caught up while watching a boxing match that you flinched as "the other guy" shot out a strike, you alreadey have an idea firsthand of the extent of Lee's genius in at coming up with ways to increase his every weapons (mind and body) like no other individual ever documented.

                            There is now a world recognized science based on that type of modeling Lee was doing before it's founders were even exposed to half the things that led them to their coding of it! And their was a guy in the thirties doing similar research who did not even know what he'd stumbled onto!

                            As one of Lee's students once noted - "Bruce has not been overestimated; on the contrary, he's been underestimated."

                            His detractors don't know any of this stuff. It's what happens when you write off someone like that prematurely.

                            They cannot see what I have just laid out here. Don't want to. For whatever reason. And, honestly, that's cool. Their loss, but nevertheless, cool.

                            To quote Tito; regardless of who sees it otherwise (that's cool); "Lee..put it all together."

                            By the way, here's a clip of Cassius Clay (Ali) - what a work of art he was in the ring... try to follow him as if you in his shoes; see what information that gives you. I find you can even do that in your mind. Because your mind, unless directed to do so, does know the difference between real and imaginary. Any nightmare will cnfirm this. Enjoy.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              [QUOTE=lucidmist;284891]...I used gloves before...but not as damaging as without gloves. I could hit the person away, but couldn't give him enough pain in his forehead or nose or chin or anywhere for that matter...

                              ... for your age, you're very well-researched....James Demile, or Taky, or many others...mentioned Bruce could fight because they've either tested him or seen him in fights... QUOTE]

                              On your...
                              Point 1: Bare knuckle issues - There's something unique to smashing someone's one's cheek-bone bare knuckle (as well as having yours smashed - God does that hurt!). The build-up of pain, shock, heart-rate, fatigue, is much faster; leading one to a greater susceptibility to being knocked out than with gloves. I once had a guy in a headlock when he turned his head and bit me. The distraction and stress such pain can lead to is something to experience - it really shows you what you're made up. Not to mention the distruction it can distract you into being prey to!

                              On another occasion, while sparring with an older guy, I finger jabbed at his eyes. He caught my fingers in his mouth and bit the hell out of them! Fire alarms went off in my head, panic, aggression, and so forth! And he would not let go! Until I grabbed his nuts....

                              Later, we both sat there; laughing, dissecting what was what. Me holding my fingers, he holding his nuts! Out of breath just from that. We both concluded that, had this been real, with no rules whatsoever, the road to knock out, pass out, or worse for one of us, would not've been that far away.

                              Point 2: Regarding my being well researched, I don't know about that. I'm often as frustrated as I am curious about what I still don't know... Still, I rember this quote fom that account of Lee's Hong Kong boxing match: "Before he left, he (Lee at 17-18) showed me some typewritten notes on Wing Chun he had prepared himself. My only recollections are of the faulty English, some reference to the traditional history of Wing Chun, and a misspelling of 'Wing Chuin'".

                              Point 3: Those who experienced Lee's skill firsthand - Check out the very end of this clip - Taky's expression; as if saying to himself something along the way of, "This m4ther f3_ker; he's doing it again - I just cannot score on him!"



                              This once again points out to me that Lee's sparring demos were not the "come at me politely, so I can I look awesome," everyone all over the internet engages in. That not only was he that good - able to maintain beautiful form while free-sparrring - but not afraid to encounter the uncertainty of possibly being scored on in public . This is evident in any of his sparring demos.

                              Come to think of it, that's not so much well-researched as it is keeping my eyes open for things - where he is week/strong/more advanced then at some other stage, and so forth. What I can learn from, etc.

                              It's really a shame he has detractors who are themselves martial artists. For there is so much there we can learn from....

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Knuckles&Knees View Post
                                ...I am questioning in my own mind the practicality or effectiveness of "trapping" as done in the way Bruce Lee taught (which I think comes from Wing Chung), have you ever used "trapping" in real life? How in gods name would anyone ever use "trapping" successfully against a western boxer?

                                I'm only asking - just because I don't comprehend something doesn't mean it doesn't or can't work.
                                PB – From my limited experience, the process of trapping is only necessary as a means to clear an obstruction to hit. Do you think Bruce had got so fast at this point no one could block him anyway thereby negating the need to trap?

                                TK (Tay Kimura; early Lee student) – Well I think that has a great deal of truth to it, Paul. I think that he developed the structure of 5 ways of attack coupled with the 4 ranges of combat and he discovered that there is only a fleeting moment when you can use any one thing as you change the distance between you and your opponent. I think that Bruce developed a greater sense of mobility and footwork at that time and I think that put everything in balance then, rather than over-emphasising any one aspect of fighting.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X