If I may presume to offer my opinion, I think that what Matt and Burton are saying is that the name JKD is meaningless, it is the application that is important. It does not matter what it is you practice if you are not training it in the alive manner with resisting oponents under stress you simply do not know if your system is effective or not. Their background is JKD as well as other things so their system reflects some of the ideas incorporated in JKD. Whether you believe JKD is a set system or a philosophy is not important. If I were to be able to take TKD and develop it in such a way that out system consistently defeated the people at SBG then they would attempt to learn why they were being beat. If this new system proved superior they would change what they are doing to that which is superior. This could be the same with any other style or system. The are measuring the system on performance. The simple truth in life is that if you have not done it you cannot say with certainty that it works. So people who have learned JKD, Karate, TKD, BJJ and have not tested it under alive circumstances cannot possibly know for certain that what they know will be viable under stress.
Bruce wanted to create a system that was based on effectiveness. What he found effective he labled JKD. As bruce found things that were better that became JKD. To further this concept is to change what JKD is. As more effective means of training are discovered they are added to JKD. If things are found to no longer work they are discarded. Much like when everyone knows the defense to a technique the technique starts to suffer in practice. It is no longer trained because it no longer works.
My question is that are techniques that work on average untrained individuals being thrown out simply because they fail against people who are trained in them.
Bruce wanted to create a system that was based on effectiveness. What he found effective he labled JKD. As bruce found things that were better that became JKD. To further this concept is to change what JKD is. As more effective means of training are discovered they are added to JKD. If things are found to no longer work they are discarded. Much like when everyone knows the defense to a technique the technique starts to suffer in practice. It is no longer trained because it no longer works.
My question is that are techniques that work on average untrained individuals being thrown out simply because they fail against people who are trained in them.
Comment