Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A mystery about Bruce Lee, never seen before.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    to the question about the unseen footage of Game of Death and the mantis man.

    when bruce died he was 2/3 done with a movie. The director finished the movie, edited and used bruce lookalilkes to come up with the end product,Game fo Death.

    the movie bruce was making before he died was called The Flute.
    it was set in this multi level building. Each level being guarded by a master of a different kind of martial art. One of them was the mantis man. but it was an unfinished movie. Very cool though. they showed this version on amc once and i have never seen it since.
    You only get to see a couple of these fight sequences in game of death.
    Also in the Flute he has two friends with him the whole time. In game of death only one of them is shown and only in a flash back where he is getting killed by kareem abdul jabar.

    Comment


    • #77
      Thank you Kodankan. I am training Chow Gar Kung Fu which is a southern mantis style, so I am interested especially in the mantis man in the footage that you have mentioned. I am not sure what AMC is, perhaps because I'm from united Kingdom, but I'll try and search for it. Many thanks.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by kung fu
        Thank you Kodankan. I am training Chow Gar Kung Fu which is a southern mantis style, so I am interested especially in the mantis man in the footage that you have mentioned. I am not sure what AMC is, perhaps because I'm from united Kingdom, but I'll try and search for it. Many thanks.
        sorry
        amc= american movie classics.
        its one of our cable channels here.
        im sure you could find out something about the flute on the net

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by kodankan
          sorry
          amc= american movie classics.
          its one of our cable channels here.
          im sure you could find out something about the flute on the net
          Thanks again. Respect.

          Comment


          • #80
            Why don't the moderators close this thread? Obviously he's just trying to get attention.

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Bjjexpertise@be
              Why don't the moderators close this thread? Obviously he's just trying to get attention.
              Are you not trying to get the attention of the moderators, it's all relative.
              Bruce Lee himself had attension, and you would not be here writing this if he did not receive any attention. Attention and intention are closely related. What ever you put your attention on becomes stronger. If you withdraw your attention from something it becomes weaker.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by kung fu
                you withdraw your attention from something it becomes weaker.
                I don't know dude I withdrew my attention from an old girlfriend and she started stalking me

                Comment


                • #83
                  Well, this is one reason why I dont post very often. Despite the fact that my first words were "this is just my opinion", I still get flamed and accused. I think even more so that you believe that my OPINION was a personal attack. Never once did I single you out but if you read your very own post, you'll see that you say "you" this and "you" that nearly a dozen times. I addressed the "subject" at hand, but you seemed to really need to lay into me alot, so I'm going to address YOU instead.

                  "If you believe that J.R.R.Tolkien designed the words 'Lord' and 'Rings' within his own signature as you stated, then you need to explain how he could have done this long before he had conceived of the book."

                  Prove to me that the signature in that picture was written before he conceived the books. People make signatures all the time. Celebrities for example do not have one signature, they have at least 2. One for autographs and for posterity, the other they sign their personal documents and checks etc. The reason for the more elaborate signatures should be pretty obvious even to "YOU."

                  "Also you state people read too much into things, implying that too much has been read into this, and then in the next sentence suggest that Tolkien created this himself "I'm pretty sure that's true in his particular case". That is a contradiction."

                  Actually it is not a contradiction, "YOU" seem to believe that because lee has kung fu or whatever in his name he's predestined to be great. I said Tolkien created his signature with Lord and Rings in it. Yes created, he did not always have such a fancy signature. Who really writes like this? "I'm pretty sure that's true in his particular case"... that he did create this signature. Create. A creation, something he made. As in i'm going to create a masterpiece on canvas. As in the guy freakin doesn't write caligraphy when he signs for a UPS package but probably has a signature he created when he wants to be fancy.

                  "If you state that he has created these words within his signature, then you are also supporting the idea that this is a real phenomenon and not just coincidence or something I have created myself."

                  "YOU" should look at the link I gave closer. People do many things with words. It's not a phenomenon, it's pretty damn clever art. What if tolkien was a english lord? What if he was a circus ring master. If he was I'm guessing people like "YOU" would find something mystical about that too.

                  "This also contradicts what you said later, when you implied that I "manipulte things". "

                  I never said "YOU" "manipulate things" I am very careful to talk about the subject and not attack the person. (except in this post for obvious reasons) "YOU" only quoted the 2 words "manipulate things." When I clearly state that "we can manipulate things." Not you, not I... "we" as in you and I both can manipulate things. Take it personal will ya.

                  "I have been designing ambigrams since 1990, and I have researched this subject endlessly, I have an unlimited amount of examples to demonstrate that hidden words are contained within peoples signatures beyond all reasonable doubt. With respect you have not seen the evidence, so you can not judge what I have done so readily. "

                  I have not judged I gave an opinion on a subject, perhaps you seem to be ridiculed so much you need to defend yourself. Personally, I was talking about your subject, and did not mention "YOU" specifically. As you may be aware, I could easily have said you you you my entire first post, but I think I've adequately made my point here.

                  "You are entitled to your opinion naturally, "

                  Yes I am, and I gave it.

                  "but be careful not to rush straight to a conclusion without studying the evidence as I have. "

                  You have not given any evidence, and you are just as guilty about rushing to conclusions.

                  "As for the "false prophets" comment, then you are suggesting that J.R.R.Tolkien is a false prophet, as you felt that he had created this himself. "

                  I said he "created" a very nice signature... consciously. Just like eli whitney created the cotton gin, or like Mozart created music. Man "YOU" are reading into things.

                  Palindromes abigrams and amagrams are good fun but they're nothing more than words. Yuri Gellar cant bend spoons, Benny Hin can't heal the sick, John Edwards cant talk to the dead, and you can't be predestined for greateness cause your signature might have some other word in it. If you think so watch out for the second coming of christ when you meet a hispanic guy named Jesus.

                  Finally, if you want to talk about the subject of this bruce lee signature stuff, lets do so instead of saying you this and you that.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    In your first message you didn't address me at all directly, despite having a great deal to say about me. I have not layed into you at all, I don't know you I was merely mirroring back to you what you said in your message. So perhaps now you know what this feels like, although I meant no offence. You appear to be quite angry, and have obviously gone to a great deal of trouble to write all of this, may I suggest that you relax, take a deep breath and focus your energy on something more constructive... and exhale. No offence was intended, certainly none was taken, so what anger is left lies at your feet.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      I dont know Elvis Pressley but if I said Elvis suggested..., Elvis felt..., Elvis did not..., Elvis said..., then you are clearly stating you know alot about Elvis. Don't say "I dont know you" when your first reply is littered with "you suggest...," "you felt...", "you etc." I suggest you take your own suggestion, relax, take a deep breath and focus your energy on something more constructive... like not proving predestination through handwriting.

                      I also have endless experience disproving many things like the bible code and nostradamus mainly cause the only way these believers see hidden messages is only after the fact that the events spoken of have happened and these messages are after the fact. Why didn't people see kung fu in bruce's signature when he was alive? If people look hard enough they can see anything. I'm sure there's an autographed picture of Cindy Crawford out there, take a look at her signature and find something, when it comes true, I'll believe, but dont tell me Adolf Hitler's signature has the word genocide in it after the fact. Feel free to continue posting, I wont post on this anymore because the subject is dead and all that is left is ad hominem.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        damn guys
                        this thread is going to turn out like the one on hs wrestling if you are not careful. I have been arguing on that one for 5 days.
                        it gets tedious bros.
                        just agree to disagree on this one and remain aquantices.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          besides i am totally lost as far as what you guys are talking about now.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by kodankan
                            I have been arguing on that one for 5 days.
                            it gets tedious bros.
                            Yes young grasshoppah, this is the way of someway-somehow, have faith that all will be revieled soon or never

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by kodankan
                              damn guys
                              this thread is going to turn out like the one on hs wrestling if you are not careful. I have been arguing on that one for 5 days.
                              it gets tedious bros.
                              You have been the sole cause of that argument and tedium, bitch. You gonna go cry on every thread on this site or what?

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                It is interesting to me how some people react to the idea that we have a destiny. Perhaps some people fear the idea, partly because they think it suggests that they are not in complete control of their lives. We all have free will, so we do have control. The truth is that, if Twighlight has endless experience at disproving many things, it suggests that he has already made up his mind on this. I originally intended to share some information with people who have an interesst in Bruce Lee, and it remains my intention. Elvis Presley was mentioned, he has one of the best examples of this phenomenon, "The King". I'm working on this next, then John Lennon's. Kodankan and Ipon are right, good chi is what it's all about. Here is the link, make of it what you will, but I hope you like it. With respecthttp://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...ADME:B:LC:UK:1

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X