One thing to remember about evolution is that it requires environmental pressure(s). Some species have diverged greatly out of the necessity to adapt. Others have changed relatively little over eons. Think of sharks. They have not changed much in several milenia. I think this is also true of the straight lead punch. Considering its speed, power and non-telegraphic quality, there doesn't seem to be pressure to change. In contrast, the JKD grappling program has needed to adapt to modern pressures IMHO. The important part is that the perpetuation of a change is not arbitrary, but useful. Otherwise we are just changing for the sake of change and possibly losing a useful characteristic such as if a shark decided to express itself by losing its gills. I think this is a widespread problem in JKDC circles, wanting something new and different purely because it is new and different and forgetting about the value of the legacy JKD has inherited.
On a side note, read the Tao of Jeet Kune Do and count the references to JKD methods of punching, footwork, etc. as well as those where JKD is presented as not being a method. A less dualistic interpretation mediates the original vs. concepts debate pretty well.
On a side note, read the Tao of Jeet Kune Do and count the references to JKD methods of punching, footwork, etc. as well as those where JKD is presented as not being a method. A less dualistic interpretation mediates the original vs. concepts debate pretty well.
Comment