So it sounds like:
By finding out what will work against a striking opponent, we will be able to transition those things against someone that isn't striking. That could go into the bag of "primary" tricks, so to speak. But if we were to go with basic fundamentals of grappling without that in mind, while we may learn basics, we will eventually have to either learn 'new' techs or adapt eventually for the ground striker. So why not learn the escapes and reversals automatically with the thought of striking and hair pulling in mind, etc., and than adjust to the minor details backwards anyway.
Than eventually go down the ladder with other techniques that may go into strictly grappling.
Reading this and rushing to get home after a long day of work, it doesn't sound exactly how I would like it to sound, but let me throw itout there anyway.
Well, those of you who train with me...you know what this means...also, I've been thinking about adding hair pulling with our ground training as well.
By finding out what will work against a striking opponent, we will be able to transition those things against someone that isn't striking. That could go into the bag of "primary" tricks, so to speak. But if we were to go with basic fundamentals of grappling without that in mind, while we may learn basics, we will eventually have to either learn 'new' techs or adapt eventually for the ground striker. So why not learn the escapes and reversals automatically with the thought of striking and hair pulling in mind, etc., and than adjust to the minor details backwards anyway.
Than eventually go down the ladder with other techniques that may go into strictly grappling.
Reading this and rushing to get home after a long day of work, it doesn't sound exactly how I would like it to sound, but let me throw itout there anyway.
Well, those of you who train with me...you know what this means...also, I've been thinking about adding hair pulling with our ground training as well.
Comment