okay, so then lets break this down.
As I understand it JKD is a continual process of evolution
So what principles are being broken? Just because Bruce was not impressed with an art doesn't mean much, he was only in his 30's when he died and obviously did not have extensive training in many arts.
So when I was taught fencing I noticed where some of the footwork came from.
Much of the trapping is from wing chun
So what about adding sections of thaiboxing break the principles. The elbows and knees seem consistent as do the low line kicks.
Bruce states that grappling should be studied further in the Tao, in his own hand written note. So training in BJJ as a range of combat that is lacking seems consistent as well.
As for the straight lead, what advantage does it have over a boxing Jab? What disadvantage. is the difference important enough to be concerned with it?
We can disagree on who knows more about JKD though, Bruce knows nothing, he is dead. The closest people to ask would be Taky, who refers everyone to Inosanto for JKD, and Inosanto. This is the senior student and the highest student. From there we have to go on too those who trained consistently with Bruce Lee, (as the evolution of the art is important the newest would actually have the most current view of the art) however others may hold important pieces that have been forgotten. As to my knowledge Linda was never involved in Teaching JKD nor was his daughter, Brandon obviously had training, but he is also dead and of no use for learning JKD.
So tell me, which principles are you refering to with each art that you are saying should not have been added to the knowledge base.
As I understand it JKD is a continual process of evolution
So what principles are being broken? Just because Bruce was not impressed with an art doesn't mean much, he was only in his 30's when he died and obviously did not have extensive training in many arts.
So when I was taught fencing I noticed where some of the footwork came from.
Much of the trapping is from wing chun
So what about adding sections of thaiboxing break the principles. The elbows and knees seem consistent as do the low line kicks.
Bruce states that grappling should be studied further in the Tao, in his own hand written note. So training in BJJ as a range of combat that is lacking seems consistent as well.
As for the straight lead, what advantage does it have over a boxing Jab? What disadvantage. is the difference important enough to be concerned with it?
We can disagree on who knows more about JKD though, Bruce knows nothing, he is dead. The closest people to ask would be Taky, who refers everyone to Inosanto for JKD, and Inosanto. This is the senior student and the highest student. From there we have to go on too those who trained consistently with Bruce Lee, (as the evolution of the art is important the newest would actually have the most current view of the art) however others may hold important pieces that have been forgotten. As to my knowledge Linda was never involved in Teaching JKD nor was his daughter, Brandon obviously had training, but he is also dead and of no use for learning JKD.
So tell me, which principles are you refering to with each art that you are saying should not have been added to the knowledge base.
Comment