Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
This is quite funny...
Collapse
X
-
Is JKD so insecure? I don't really think that would be the question. It's more if the author is just trying to cash in on the JKD/Bruce Lee stuff. People miss the whole point of JKD frequently and it's usually those people that write these books.
Comment
-
My knee jerk response to teh thread was ..... "well that's not being insecure...it's is actually smart to stregthen your weaknesses"
Then I read:
Jeet Kune Do Ground fighting is where we take the base of Brazilian jiu-jitsu and add all the nasty, illegal things that Brazilian jiu-jitsu fighters don't include because of their sport. Designed for self-preservation, we add locking techniques, small joint manipulation, pressure points, and eye jabs to the groundfighting range. This is from a jeet kune do instructors point of view.
Yeah
Corny, I don't study BJJ but any jujutsu stylist much less BJJ knows all of this and adding guaging...oh I see pass the gaurd with bil gee
and he will amke money off of others ignorance....damn wish I thought of it.
Comment
-
Most people have a misconception about grappling... A lot of people figure they can learn a few BJJ techniques, then apply their own techniques and that should be enough... Not so, against an experienced grappler.
Grappling, like any art, takes a lot of time to become proficient in... If these JKD people were serious about understanding grappling, they would be well-served to join a gym and learn just like everyone else. Picking up a few techniques here and there isn't going to thwart any grappler.
For instance, if you learned a few boxing combos and punches, then stepped into the ring against a veteran... You're still toast.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Aug 2003
- 215
-
The key to immortality is first to live a life worth remembering
--Bruce Lee
On the mountains of truth you can never climb in vain: either you will reach a point higher up today, or you will be training your powers so that you will be able to climb higher tomorrow
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
I think the customer reviews on the books say it best. Basically, if you're new to grappling the book presents common situations well enough to act as a primer. It also points out elements that should be focused on for the street and not the sport.
Is it the be-all-end-all of grappling? Of course not. In martial arts there isn't any such thing. Do I think its a corny book and cheap plot to score some quick cash? Yeah, I do.Last edited by Nutz; 09-18-2003, 10:47 AM.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Dec 2002
- 415
-
Academy of Kempo Ju Jitsu & Association
http://www.scientific-streetfighting.com/
"If people say Jeet Kune Do is different from "this" or from "that," then let the name of Jeet Kune Do be wiped out, for that is what it is, just a name. Please don't fuss over it."
-----Great SiGung Bruce Lee-----
Originally posted by Great Sage
Most people have a misconception about grappling... A lot of people figure they can learn a few BJJ techniques, then apply their own techniques and that should be enough... Not so, against an experienced grappler.
Grappling, like any art, takes a lot of time to become proficient in... If these JKD people were serious about understanding grappling, they would be well-served to join a gym and learn just like everyone else. Picking up a few techniques here and there isn't going to thwart any grappler.
For instance, if you learned a few boxing combos and punches, then stepped into the ring against a veteran... You're still toast.
Now you're slamming it. I have to tell you that I teach my students to do just that, to "beat" the experienced grappler. Not at his game but at "our" game. If you let him control the fight, then yes the "experience" will prevail.
But what YOU are missing is that "most good" JKD'ers do spend considerable amounts of time in BJJ because it is the most effient way to "understand" the ground game.
Anyone that spends a a few months or a year hear and there is not a JKD'er and I think thats you're impression is. Tell me if I'm wrong but if you've seen the real JKD then YOU know that you're wrong.
That guys book may be a scam but what art does not have low life scummy trolls?
Comment
-
Originally posted by akja
[B]I could of sworn that it wasn't that long ago that you were claiming JKD?/B]
Originally posted by akja
Now you're slamming it. I have to tell you that I teach my students to do just that, to "beat" the experienced grappler. Not at his game but at "our" game. If you let him control the fight, then yes the "experience" will prevail.
Originally posted by akja
But what YOU are missing is that "most good" JKD'ers do spend considerable amounts of time in BJJ because it is the most effient way to "understand" the ground game.
Anyone that spends a a few months or a year hear and there is not a JKD'er and I think thats you're impression is. Tell me if I'm wrong but if you've seen the real JKD then YOU know that you're wrong.
That guys book may be a scam but what art does not have low life scummy trolls?
My point is that if this book is any indication of JKD, then it’s an insecure message.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Dec 2002
- 415
-
Academy of Kempo Ju Jitsu & Association
http://www.scientific-streetfighting.com/
"If people say Jeet Kune Do is different from "this" or from "that," then let the name of Jeet Kune Do be wiped out, for that is what it is, just a name. Please don't fuss over it."
-----Great SiGung Bruce Lee-----
Originally posted by Great Sage
No, I NEVER said I belonged to a JKD camp. I DID say that conceptually what I do is similar to JKD. At least I agree on this idea—”take what is useful and develop from there.”
I’m not slamming JKD, I’m slamming this idea that one can learn a few BJJ techniques and hope to defeat an expert. What you teach your students is your business... In fact, I agree with you. It’s advisable to play your game, although that’s not always an option.
No, that’s not my impression of JKD guys. When I think of JKD guys, Paul Vunak is the first person that comes to mind because my kickboxing instructor trained extensively with him.
My point is that if this book is any indication of JKD, then it’s an insecure message.
My students are more fortunate than I was because I teach them the "weaknesses" of all the arts that I've been exposed to and also the "weaknesses" in what I teach. But there has to be a balance in our training, a tradeoff for our experiences. If we are not expecting to get hit, then we shouldn't be fighting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by akja
Sage, you are mature for your age and I know you get flamed a lot. Thats not what I'm about. Just remember there is NO single art that is the ultimate art. Everything has a counter in all arts and all arts have flaws. Thats why JKD is "tailored" to the individual.
Originally posted by akja
My students are more fortunate than I was because I teach them the "weaknesses" of all the arts that I've been exposed to and also the "weaknesses" in what I teach. But there has to be a balance in our training, a tradeoff for our experiences. If we are not expecting to get hit, then we shouldn't be fighting.
Comment
Comment