No
Let's say you were taking Calculus. Now the instructor not only has a syllabus he haws 15 other students whose questions/needs he has to take into account while moving through it. Each student might have questions regarding aspects you already get which he then spends time going over, while you are stuck on certain parts, but he cannot afford to take a whole class or a whole week covering that and concentrating soley on your understanding and needs.
Likewise say you show particular apptitude in certain aspects or seem to learn certain things in a particular manner. Being that you are not the only student the odds of hime actually noticing this and then being able to focus, direct and nurture that skill will be limited.
So if you then hired that teacher to work with you and you alone, to teach you and tailor his teaching to the speed and specifics of your abilities, it would not be a failure on his part at all that you now learned faster. Quite the opposiste. I would take the position that it is a failure on the part of a teacher who *cannot* teach a student far faster and better alone then in a group. Because then he is merely someone who repeats information he knows in rote, and not one who truly understands it.
All in all I would say the ideal situation would be a 3 person group taking classes so that each of you could still work with people of varying skills/styles, the instructor could still personalize the course, and while any one student was having one on one attention the other students could either learn new things from that (from that students partiuclar needs/questions) or work together (spar, practice, etc.)
Let's say you were taking Calculus. Now the instructor not only has a syllabus he haws 15 other students whose questions/needs he has to take into account while moving through it. Each student might have questions regarding aspects you already get which he then spends time going over, while you are stuck on certain parts, but he cannot afford to take a whole class or a whole week covering that and concentrating soley on your understanding and needs.
Likewise say you show particular apptitude in certain aspects or seem to learn certain things in a particular manner. Being that you are not the only student the odds of hime actually noticing this and then being able to focus, direct and nurture that skill will be limited.
So if you then hired that teacher to work with you and you alone, to teach you and tailor his teaching to the speed and specifics of your abilities, it would not be a failure on his part at all that you now learned faster. Quite the opposiste. I would take the position that it is a failure on the part of a teacher who *cannot* teach a student far faster and better alone then in a group. Because then he is merely someone who repeats information he knows in rote, and not one who truly understands it.
All in all I would say the ideal situation would be a 3 person group taking classes so that each of you could still work with people of varying skills/styles, the instructor could still personalize the course, and while any one student was having one on one attention the other students could either learn new things from that (from that students partiuclar needs/questions) or work together (spar, practice, etc.)
Comment