I dunno, but I think most MMAers see things in a much more limited view, basing it off the exact drills they do and anything that matches what they've seen/practiced before. Rather then analyze the fight as it is right there, thinking what would be most ideal to knock this guy out, they simply think "throw a cross because he commited to the attack he just made" when as long as you keep things inside the limits of the himan body, there could probably be 10 different, possibly more effective things, but they would never think of that, because chuck liddell doesn't do it! or it's just crazy talk.. Hey if its more effective and it's possible do, don't do exact replicas of the 5 different punches, do what will work best-in many cases it will probably be a punch, but I think they lack that intuitive thinking unless it's laid out before them.
Well, for example, It was a bad fight, but when Rashad fought whats his name, and whats his name was on the ground, Rashad did a sort of leaping face punch---that's kinda what I'm talking about, something completey unexpected but seemingly very effective, and using much less effort than getting on the ground with him and rolling wit him I'm willing to bet.
Well, for example, It was a bad fight, but when Rashad fought whats his name, and whats his name was on the ground, Rashad did a sort of leaping face punch---that's kinda what I'm talking about, something completey unexpected but seemingly very effective, and using much less effort than getting on the ground with him and rolling wit him I'm willing to bet.
Comment