I'm starting this thread to compare and contrast punching styles from across the board. And before we get started, lets keep it clean - no smack talking; let's keep the criticism constructive.
A punch is a punch, right? While almost every style throws punches, variances in stance, on-guard position and additional weapons available change the punches tactical delivery.
For example, a round house punch delivered from a style like Hung-gar or Choy Lay Fut gong fu can come from a deep, rooted stance and swing from a wide angle. The punch may seem slower, but will have a lot of torque behind it since it comes from a "longer" arm (remember physics?).
Boxers stand higher up, although slightly crouched (knees slightly bent). The hook is a shorter lever (arm bent at 90 degrees) than a round-house punch and by itself delivers less torque; however the boxer powers all of his punches from the legs and not just the hips and shoulders - so the hook could deliver just as much torque as the roundhouse, but as much if not more power since it is faster and more explosive.
Connecting the dots...
In short, the hook is a faster, more compact and explosive punch. With some good footwork and feinting, it can be used as a first strike. And since it is so explosive it will damage anything it hits.
The long-fist, round house punch may be a bit slower than the hook, a little less explosive and therefore easier to defend against if it is the first technique used, but in the heat an exchange, the punch becomes a block against straight punches if it crosses the center line.
If the gong-fu fighter has good reflexes and has developed his forearm/grip strength, he could also be in good position to seize an arm. Being in a deep stance, with a lower center of gravity, grappling would be favorable.
my 0.01 cent on punching from different styles.
A punch is a punch, right? While almost every style throws punches, variances in stance, on-guard position and additional weapons available change the punches tactical delivery.
For example, a round house punch delivered from a style like Hung-gar or Choy Lay Fut gong fu can come from a deep, rooted stance and swing from a wide angle. The punch may seem slower, but will have a lot of torque behind it since it comes from a "longer" arm (remember physics?).
Boxers stand higher up, although slightly crouched (knees slightly bent). The hook is a shorter lever (arm bent at 90 degrees) than a round-house punch and by itself delivers less torque; however the boxer powers all of his punches from the legs and not just the hips and shoulders - so the hook could deliver just as much torque as the roundhouse, but as much if not more power since it is faster and more explosive.
Connecting the dots...
In short, the hook is a faster, more compact and explosive punch. With some good footwork and feinting, it can be used as a first strike. And since it is so explosive it will damage anything it hits.
The long-fist, round house punch may be a bit slower than the hook, a little less explosive and therefore easier to defend against if it is the first technique used, but in the heat an exchange, the punch becomes a block against straight punches if it crosses the center line.
If the gong-fu fighter has good reflexes and has developed his forearm/grip strength, he could also be in good position to seize an arm. Being in a deep stance, with a lower center of gravity, grappling would be favorable.
my 0.01 cent on punching from different styles.
Comment