Hi,
I thought I would ask for the opinions of some of you guys on here that probably have ALOT more real world fighting experience than I do.
A friend of mine said that because his grappling and striking skills are about the same that he will decide how to start out in a fight depending upon the height of his opponent. If it is a guy that is alot taller than he is he will try to shoot and take the fight to the ground right off because of the reach advantage his opponent would have if he tried to just strike at the guy (i.e. the reach advantage is taken away to a large extent when on the ground).
If the guy is shorter than he is he will just attempt to keep the fight OFF the ground and try to K.O. the guy (i.e. your reach advantage is kept if the fight stays OFF the ground).
What do you guys think of basing your starting strategy on the reach of your opponent. I'm no expert by a LONG way, but it seems to make some sense to me.
Of course this is assuming that you are the one who can dictate where the fight will go, and naturally this will depend on the skill and actions of your opponent. But here I'm assuming that you can dictate where the fight will go at the beginning, this being the case does this strategy make sense. I'm also assuming that you aren't a far superior grappler than striker, or vice versa, in which case you would base your strategy on that.
I'm also assuming that you don't know anything about your opponent but his height (i.e. you wouldn't try to take your opponent to the ground, even if he was way taller than you are, if you knew he was a champion submission wrestler or something).
Please let me know what you guys think of my friend's strategy, and if it makes any sense, or if it is even a reasonable idea at all.
I thought I would ask for the opinions of some of you guys on here that probably have ALOT more real world fighting experience than I do.
A friend of mine said that because his grappling and striking skills are about the same that he will decide how to start out in a fight depending upon the height of his opponent. If it is a guy that is alot taller than he is he will try to shoot and take the fight to the ground right off because of the reach advantage his opponent would have if he tried to just strike at the guy (i.e. the reach advantage is taken away to a large extent when on the ground).
If the guy is shorter than he is he will just attempt to keep the fight OFF the ground and try to K.O. the guy (i.e. your reach advantage is kept if the fight stays OFF the ground).
What do you guys think of basing your starting strategy on the reach of your opponent. I'm no expert by a LONG way, but it seems to make some sense to me.
Of course this is assuming that you are the one who can dictate where the fight will go, and naturally this will depend on the skill and actions of your opponent. But here I'm assuming that you can dictate where the fight will go at the beginning, this being the case does this strategy make sense. I'm also assuming that you aren't a far superior grappler than striker, or vice versa, in which case you would base your strategy on that.
I'm also assuming that you don't know anything about your opponent but his height (i.e. you wouldn't try to take your opponent to the ground, even if he was way taller than you are, if you knew he was a champion submission wrestler or something).
Please let me know what you guys think of my friend's strategy, and if it makes any sense, or if it is even a reasonable idea at all.
Comment