Anybody see this?
The author claims that--if you're talking street-fighting--it would be better to study lots of different arts but you don't really need more than six months each.
Why? He asks the question: in any streetfight he's been in or you've been in, name all the techniques you've used. He said he's used punches, a round kick, a front kick and a sidekick, once. With his baton (he's also a cop)--he has longtime Kali training, regardless the basic strikes are the only ones that he's used or have been effective.
And so the argument goes, in streetfighting, the basic techniques are the only ones that you'll get to use, so if you're learning lots of advanced techniques and your goal is street survival, you're probably wasting a lot of time, because it's stuff you'll never use.
Learn the basics, perfect them and move on.
So is this guy enlightened or is he providing a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none fallacy?
The author claims that--if you're talking street-fighting--it would be better to study lots of different arts but you don't really need more than six months each.
Why? He asks the question: in any streetfight he's been in or you've been in, name all the techniques you've used. He said he's used punches, a round kick, a front kick and a sidekick, once. With his baton (he's also a cop)--he has longtime Kali training, regardless the basic strikes are the only ones that he's used or have been effective.
And so the argument goes, in streetfighting, the basic techniques are the only ones that you'll get to use, so if you're learning lots of advanced techniques and your goal is street survival, you're probably wasting a lot of time, because it's stuff you'll never use.
Learn the basics, perfect them and move on.
So is this guy enlightened or is he providing a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none fallacy?
Comment