Greetings good folks of Defend.net. There's a lot of discussion going into the comparisons of of BJJ and judo around these parts - both in techniques, strategy and philosophy.
BJJ has the marketing machine of the UFC and is the primary grappling tool for fighters from the early days of Brazillian Vale Tudo to today's UFCs - but here in the states, BJJ is a relatively new art compared to the presence of Judo.
I have more experience with BJJ and no experience with Judo, although I have grappled against Judoka long ago - although currently my BJJ is a bit rusty. From what I remembered, Judoka were really good at takedowns and pretty good on the ground - whereas at the time, my BJJ training spent more time working on the ground, the only time I was able to even get close to getting the upperhand.
I would like to hear other's discussions and comparisons of BJJ vs. Judo, especially from the Defend.net experts (those whom are much more experienced at these arts than I've been). Especially from guys like BJJ expertise, Tanto, Micheal Wright, TTE and any others.
BJJ has the marketing machine of the UFC and is the primary grappling tool for fighters from the early days of Brazillian Vale Tudo to today's UFCs - but here in the states, BJJ is a relatively new art compared to the presence of Judo.
I have more experience with BJJ and no experience with Judo, although I have grappled against Judoka long ago - although currently my BJJ is a bit rusty. From what I remembered, Judoka were really good at takedowns and pretty good on the ground - whereas at the time, my BJJ training spent more time working on the ground, the only time I was able to even get close to getting the upperhand.
I would like to hear other's discussions and comparisons of BJJ vs. Judo, especially from the Defend.net experts (those whom are much more experienced at these arts than I've been). Especially from guys like BJJ expertise, Tanto, Micheal Wright, TTE and any others.
Comment