Reviving Mousels- Takada the Great vs Rickson #1

[Tape Lord]

No sabrutwat, the beauty of posting a quote at the end of your post is in having a short quote that is like a 1,000 words. Not 1,000 words that delivers a short message.


As usual, you fail to grasp on what page the rest of us are on.

Have a nice day though

Tape Lord

[sakattacked]

Shimora is trolling. That fight was a work and Kimo vs. Sak was too. Racism has nothing to do with this discussion. And Japanese fighters are more adept at leg locks?!

Do people think Takada can really beat Coleman, even if Coleman was losing a lot back then? Stop trolling Shimora.

[Shimora]

Tell me sakattack.

What evidence do you have to support your outlandish claims that both Kimo/Sak and Coleman/Takada were works?


This ought to be good.




We shall see who the real troll is.

[Tape Lord]

Shimora is correct.

Tape Lord

[sakattacked]

Shimora,

I have no more evidence than what I see on celluloid and comments from Sak (he said Kimo was NOT his first NHB fight) and Coleman (provide for my family).

Also, Coleman has never been submitted despite the good competition he's been in with. And the great Takada caught him in a leg lock? You put all this together and it spells "W O R K."

[Shimora]

Thats what I thought. A couple of misinterpreted comments are not proof of either fight being a work.
Of course Coleman is going to try to make an excuse. When Sak said Kimo was not his first NHB fight he was referring to fights in the Pride organization.

[sakattacked]

Coleman making an excuse with "provide for my family"? That's a funny excuse. Why would Sak only refer to Pride fights? He was asked what his first NHB fight was he said it wasn't against Kimo.

But I'm not going on these comments alone. Look at the fights themselves. Also, look at the competition Coleman's been in with. Those tree trunk legs are awfully hard to submit. But of course, the great Takada did it.

[Shimora]

I miss the old days.