Mild7, you had me and then you lost me.
Your first two parts are debatable, but for the most part understandable.
However, you claim that Bruce just "pointed out the obvious," so where's the genius in that?
Well, no other "geniuses" seemed to figure it out before him. As I said before, genius is often about revealing the obvious, the simple.
Your claim that nothing would be different had he not come along is preposterous. Perhaps somebody else would've come to the same enlightenment, but he was the one who did first. Now you're engaging in revisionist history, or denial.
Not to mention the fact that you don't seem particularly well-versed in just what theories Lee put forth with JKD, other than "the five ways of attack," et al.
For the record, I like Bruce Lee and admire him but hardly idolize the man. However, give credit where credit's due. Your refusal to do so tells me there's something else in play here...
Your first two parts are debatable, but for the most part understandable.
However, you claim that Bruce just "pointed out the obvious," so where's the genius in that?
Well, no other "geniuses" seemed to figure it out before him. As I said before, genius is often about revealing the obvious, the simple.
Your claim that nothing would be different had he not come along is preposterous. Perhaps somebody else would've come to the same enlightenment, but he was the one who did first. Now you're engaging in revisionist history, or denial.
Not to mention the fact that you don't seem particularly well-versed in just what theories Lee put forth with JKD, other than "the five ways of attack," et al.
For the record, I like Bruce Lee and admire him but hardly idolize the man. However, give credit where credit's due. Your refusal to do so tells me there's something else in play here...
Comment