Sorry for hogging my own thread, but I just want to say something for Belly.
Belly- I have read and thought about what you've said. However, I think the flaw in your line of thought is that you seem to assume that having a large selection of "moves" at your disposal makes you a better fighter.
A recent quote from you is as follows:
"Do they (boxers) know about underhook/overhook? Double underhook? double overhook? both hands around the kneck thai clinching? Do they know the footwork to controll the neck? Takedowns from the clinch? Probably not."
Personally, I don't believe that knowing many fancy moves makes you a better fighter (thought it may come in handy if your goal in life is to be awarded a black belt!). On the contrary, I have reason to believe that studying too many moves makes a person a weaker fighter. This position is in line with what Bruce Lee taught and what many of the JKD guys believe.
Belly- I have read and thought about what you've said. However, I think the flaw in your line of thought is that you seem to assume that having a large selection of "moves" at your disposal makes you a better fighter.
A recent quote from you is as follows:
"Do they (boxers) know about underhook/overhook? Double underhook? double overhook? both hands around the kneck thai clinching? Do they know the footwork to controll the neck? Takedowns from the clinch? Probably not."
Personally, I don't believe that knowing many fancy moves makes you a better fighter (thought it may come in handy if your goal in life is to be awarded a black belt!). On the contrary, I have reason to believe that studying too many moves makes a person a weaker fighter. This position is in line with what Bruce Lee taught and what many of the JKD guys believe.
Comment