Originally posted by IPON
My point was just because a martial arts is a modified version of another art doesn't make it any less of a martial arts.Most styles were copied from some other martial arts does that mean most of them are not considered a martial arts? I think not.I would say what makes one less of a martial arts is what the style teaches,if it teaches unrealistic self-defense however doesn't mean it's not a martial arts.How unrealistic I believe karate,kung fu,tkd etc.are I know they're still a form of martial arts.
1. JKD is a Philosophy
I agree but it still is a martial arts.
2. JKD is an actual MA with specific technique (in fact early criticisms of JKD while bruce was alive was that in was not a true MA due to its lack of weapons training)
This I disagree with,just because it lacks weapons training doesn't mean it's not a martial arts but back then I guess they were ignorant in this aspect.
Now the Philosophy of JKD no one can argue. However, when Lee started he was a wing chun practitioner From Seattle, LA and Oakland what he taught his Jun Fan gung fu to JKD was basically an incomplete form or "modified" of wingchun. Now there is a type of wing chun called "modified wing chun" but that does not apply to Lee or JKD. Lee "Modified" the wing chun that learned, basically filling in the gaps he had in training.
I won't argue the fact that he started off as a Wing Chun practitioner,because having studied about Bruce I know this to be true.However how could he teach Juan Fan Gung Fu to JKD ,if he's the one who invented JKD?
I also agree that JKD was a modified version of wing chun as I never said it wasn't I was just argueing the fact that Sherwinc said it's not considered a martial arts. Just because it's a modified version doesn't mean it's not a martial arts.Is this not true? If being modified means it's not a martial arts then I guess Jujutisu isn't a martial arts either since it's a modified version of Judo,if I am correct.I personally consider both judo and jujitsu martial arts.
Now the next part I can only give my opinions, others will disagree (opinions are like assholes ...everyone has one). Lee was trying to find his way in MA, WC was his vehicle. In order to teach the masses the philosophy he had to be able to demonstrate, otherwise he would be one of the esoteric grandmasters that he himself complained about. What he was his modified version of wing chun or JKD. This JKD changed as he changed. The reason he did not want to name the style nor did he want the name used is because the point was not the technique per se it was the philosophy behind it...the MA style did not matter.
I can't argue this because this too I know is true.
Now everyone wants to call their style JKD for profit. They either strictly hold onto what was taught in LA Seattle or Oakland which is opposite to the goal of JKD or they have some other MMa format which has nothing to do what Lee taught. Personally, I wish people would stop disrespecting Lee and leave the name alone.
I really doubt this,I don't think everyone wants to call their style JKD after all I don't think there are many JKD schools around any more at least not here in B.C. I only know of one here.
Comment