If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
PS. Is there such a thing as a non-deadly killing art?
Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.
Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.
what the hell are you talking about.
killing technique must be a killing technique. A non-deadly killing technique would be an oxy-moron, it would imply that by being non-deadly, it kills.
A killing technique kills by definition.
The masters you refer to simply don't apply the killing technique, they don't use them, but they know them and can teach them...is that what you're trying to say??? The killing belongs to the technique "a priori", what seperates the killing technique from killing is the application and intent....right???
what the hell are you talking about.
killing technique must be a killing technique. A non-deadly killing technique would be an oxy-moron, it would imply that by being non-deadly, it kills.
A killing technique kills by definition.
The masters you refer to simply don't apply the killing technique, they don't use them, but they know them and can teach them...is that what you're trying to say??? The killing belongs to the technique "a priori", what seperates the killing technique from killing is the application and intent....right???
Like a gun, a bomb, or a knife is only dangerous or deadly etc, in the hands of an idiot or a psychopath etc, so is a deadly killing technique. You are trying to contradict me but you cannot as I am right in what I said so wtf is your point?
Lol, I think non-deadly killing art is putting it wrong. Garland kinda has ya there. But I understand what you are saying. It's just incorrect wording.
Lol, I think non-deadly killing art is putting it wrong. Garland kinda has ya there. But I understand what you are saying. It's just incorrect wording.
A healing art that may be used as a killing art then.
Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.
So if it's non-deadly how is it a killing art again mate?
Like a gun, a bomb, or a knife is only dangerous or deadly etc, in the hands of an idiot or a psychopath etc, so is a deadly killing technique. You are trying to contradict me but you cannot as I am right in what I said so wtf is your point?
No, a gun or knife is inherently deadly mate, even an accident can result in death innit. A non-deadly knife is a rubber knife, not a real one just handled carefully mate.
These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?
No, a gun or knife is inherently deadly mate, even an accident can result in death innit. A non-deadly knife is a rubber knife, not a real one just handled carefully mate.
These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?
These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?
hawrang-do - teh koreans used it 2 fend off teh japanese invasions in teh olden days. teh japs outnumbered them and had swords n stuff. But teh koreans used teh deadly hwa rang business on em!
i fink it was hwarang do neway, it may ave bin taekwon-do. cant remember 2 b honest!
Comment