Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obsessive, deluded students.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by BoarSpear
    hey man im an old sailor, the only way to offend me is to call me "sir."
    You know I'm gonna use that now...

    Edit; wait.. maybe I'm being duped into calling Boarspear a title of respect and authority.... *goes off to ponder his dillema)

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by nutter
      How so?


      PS. Is there such a thing as a non-deadly killing art?
      Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Richard Kerr
        Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.
        what the hell are you talking about.
        killing technique must be a killing technique. A non-deadly killing technique would be an oxy-moron, it would imply that by being non-deadly, it kills.
        A killing technique kills by definition.

        The masters you refer to simply don't apply the killing technique, they don't use them, but they know them and can teach them...is that what you're trying to say??? The killing belongs to the technique "a priori", what seperates the killing technique from killing is the application and intent....right???

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Garland
          what the hell are you talking about.
          killing technique must be a killing technique. A non-deadly killing technique would be an oxy-moron, it would imply that by being non-deadly, it kills.
          A killing technique kills by definition.

          The masters you refer to simply don't apply the killing technique, they don't use them, but they know them and can teach them...is that what you're trying to say??? The killing belongs to the technique "a priori", what seperates the killing technique from killing is the application and intent....right???
          Like a gun, a bomb, or a knife is only dangerous or deadly etc, in the hands of an idiot or a psychopath etc, so is a deadly killing technique. You are trying to contradict me but you cannot as I am right in what I said so wtf is your point?

          Comment


          • #35
            Lol, I think non-deadly killing art is putting it wrong. Garland kinda has ya there. But I understand what you are saying. It's just incorrect wording.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by J-Luck
              Lol, I think non-deadly killing art is putting it wrong. Garland kinda has ya there. But I understand what you are saying. It's just incorrect wording.
              A healing art that may be used as a killing art then.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Richard Kerr
                Most people that are skilled enough to Master these Arts would probably tell you to piss off but I won't do that. Most Masters or Grandmasters of killing techniques don't want to kill people, hence they don't so yes there is such a thing as a non-deadly killing art.
                So if it's non-deadly how is it a killing art again mate?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by nutter
                  How so?


                  PS. Is there such a thing as a non-deadly killing art?
                  Nutter you have made me think that I said there was such a thing which is why I was back pedalling, sorry I jumped the gun then.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Richard Kerr
                    Like a gun, a bomb, or a knife is only dangerous or deadly etc, in the hands of an idiot or a psychopath etc, so is a deadly killing technique. You are trying to contradict me but you cannot as I am right in what I said so wtf is your point?
                    No, a gun or knife is inherently deadly mate, even an accident can result in death innit. A non-deadly knife is a rubber knife, not a real one just handled carefully mate.

                    These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by SamuraiGuy
                      Really cause your mom wanted me to tell her all the raunchy stories....
                      My mom is probably a bit older than your mom so you're getting into 'gilf' territory, but hey its a good start in the right direction...

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by nutter
                        No, a gun or knife is inherently deadly mate, even an accident can result in death innit. A non-deadly knife is a rubber knife, not a real one just handled carefully mate.

                        These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?
                        Origami is apparently the most deadly of all.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by nutter
                          I'm on spring break from the 10th grade and have nothing better to do than post stupid crap on the internet from my dad's computer.

                          Mr Kerr, good thread. Sorry about the vapidity running rampant around here lately.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Richard Kerr
                            Origami is apparently the most deadly of all.
                            What, by paper cut mate???? You are stark raving mad mate.

                            No seriously mate, which arts are those that you mean when you say "deadly killing arts" mate?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              strange mate-ing habits

                              Originally posted by nutter
                              What, by paper cut mate???? You are stark raving mad mate.

                              No seriously mate, which arts are those that you mean when you say "deadly killing arts" mate?

                              Wow, that was 4 "mate"s that time. A new record, eh mate?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                These killing arts you keep on about, what arts are they again?
                                hawrang-do - teh koreans used it 2 fend off teh japanese invasions in teh olden days. teh japs outnumbered them and had swords n stuff. But teh koreans used teh deadly hwa rang business on em!

                                i fink it was hwarang do neway, it may ave bin taekwon-do. cant remember 2 b honest!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X