Originally posted by Sagacious Lu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A Turkish man gets in an argument and ends up taking on about 8 guys at once and wins
Collapse
X
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2093
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
Do you guys need a refresher in specialist vs. generalist again? The last time I ranted on that some folks got all out of sorts (hehe).
Comment
-
Originally posted by DickHardman View Postremember, inflation is another reason you may need supplemental coverage. over time, inflation can substantially reduce the purchasing power of your life insurance dollar.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2093
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
Oh alright I'll explain what I mean...
A specialist discipline is one that has limited range of operation and function. As an example karate or boxing are specialist disciplines because they are only useful at a specific range from the threat and offer limited options (limited to striking). If the threat is to far away to reach with a punch or a kick for instance boxing or karate is of little use. If the threat is to close maybe in a grappling situation boxing doesn’t offer many options.
The same goes for grappling such as in BJJ, wrestling, judo, etc; they simply are limited as to the range from the threat and do not offer the practitioner much in the way of anything outside of a specific range. In other words boxing, karate, etc, as good as they are at answering certain problems they only offer solutions within a restricted set of parameters.
You can look at almost any single discipline in this same regard even weapons based disciplines including firearms because most are limited either by range from the threat or the type of threat or both. If the threat is outside of parameters the discipline looses its robustness. A specialist discipline simply does not offer a wide range of tactical options.
The generalist is a guy who can fight with his hands, on the ground, with a knife, with a gun and he can deal with threats from the stand off range to the bad breath range and even more importantly he can transition from one range to another and from weapon to weapon safely and smoothly. He has more tactical options.
The generalist may not be as good of boxer as the guy who specifically trains for boxing, he may not be as good of a wrestler as the guy who trains only for wrestling, he may not be as skilled with a knife as the guy who spends all his time training with the knife, and he may not be as good of marksman on cardboard targets as the guy who trains day in and day out and competes in marksmanship tournaments but he is good at all those things. The generalist is the guy who can take the most potent and most practical list from the specialist disciplines and tie them smoothly together for a formidable fighting skill set that has workable solutions at all ranges from the threat including multiple and armed threats.
But still the video was fun to watch.
Comment
-
Registered User
- Feb 2003
- 2093
-
The law of tyranny:
1. Any power that can be abused will be abused
2. Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it.
3. If people don't resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail.
Welcome to the Socialist States of Amerika . Coming soon Jan 20th 2009!
I just want to add,
I think most of us strive to obtain some degree of skill in multiple disciplines so we can have a broader base. The controversy comes (as I alluded to earlier) when someone takes offense because he is told their particular style/system isn’t good for self-defense, say Judo for example. Judo besides being a great sport is also very good for self-defense as long as the problem being presented falls within a specific given set of parameters. The problem lays in the fact that criminal assaults do not happen in a vacuum and they all to often fall outside any one set of given parameters.
Comment
Comment