Tweet
Bismarck Tribune - North Dakota News - Fargo man wrestles knife from attacker -- This story only says that the victim grabbed the knife hand and hit the mugger. Where did he attempt to te-bo him?
ISIAH CAREY'S 'INSITE': MAN ALLEGEDLY TRIES TO ATTACK QUANELL X AT FITNESS GYM! --- This story had several people overwhelm one man with a knife. When they wrote "wrestled" they didn't mean the kind that includes suplexes and firemen's carries. And in case you missed it, several people against one man with a knife hardly satisfies the challenge.
Women fend off attacker with Kleenex box, curtain rod -- In this story the robber never intended to hurt anyone. He could have easily have killed the elderly woman to quiet her or keep her from resisting, but instead he kept using verbal cues as opposed to any real force. There is no real attack unless you use force. He had a knife an NEVER attempted to use it. That wasn't self defense .. that was two women who beat up an unwilling would-be robber.
Cabbie, cousin knifed by passenger: The attacker robbed the two men at knifepoint and stabbed them before hurling racial slurs at them. | Article from Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK) | HighBeam Research --This one is just like the second one. It took multiple men to subdue one man with a blade. In both examples it was a group effort, not any one man using "wrestling" to save his ass.
TPF: Italian Tourist Fights Off Knife Attack On Upper East Side -- This is the only story where someone actually fought on their own to survive. And in this story she simply resisted. She didn't wrestle or tae-bo the mugger. She simply grabbed the knife and did her best. The mugger's intention was to rob her, not kill her. Otherwise he would have continued until he did kill her.
Like IPON stated earlier, none of your stories made you and Garland's case any stronger. In fact, all you did was type in the words "knife" and "wrestle" into a search engine and you posted what came up. And the fact that you thought that these stories support anything you've said shows that you're completely retarded. We were discussing violence, not intimidation, on an individual level. The stories you gave me might as well have been the Gracie brothers who travel in packs to keep it fair.
You admitted earlier that you put no effort into finding these stories, but what you failed to mention that you just went out and did a homework assignment that UKE gave you like a good little bitch.
DJForest was right ... You can be house broken!
ISIAH CAREY'S 'INSITE': MAN ALLEGEDLY TRIES TO ATTACK QUANELL X AT FITNESS GYM! --- This story had several people overwhelm one man with a knife. When they wrote "wrestled" they didn't mean the kind that includes suplexes and firemen's carries. And in case you missed it, several people against one man with a knife hardly satisfies the challenge.
Women fend off attacker with Kleenex box, curtain rod -- In this story the robber never intended to hurt anyone. He could have easily have killed the elderly woman to quiet her or keep her from resisting, but instead he kept using verbal cues as opposed to any real force. There is no real attack unless you use force. He had a knife an NEVER attempted to use it. That wasn't self defense .. that was two women who beat up an unwilling would-be robber.
Cabbie, cousin knifed by passenger: The attacker robbed the two men at knifepoint and stabbed them before hurling racial slurs at them. | Article from Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK) | HighBeam Research --This one is just like the second one. It took multiple men to subdue one man with a blade. In both examples it was a group effort, not any one man using "wrestling" to save his ass.
TPF: Italian Tourist Fights Off Knife Attack On Upper East Side -- This is the only story where someone actually fought on their own to survive. And in this story she simply resisted. She didn't wrestle or tae-bo the mugger. She simply grabbed the knife and did her best. The mugger's intention was to rob her, not kill her. Otherwise he would have continued until he did kill her.
Like IPON stated earlier, none of your stories made you and Garland's case any stronger. In fact, all you did was type in the words "knife" and "wrestle" into a search engine and you posted what came up. And the fact that you thought that these stories support anything you've said shows that you're completely retarded. We were discussing violence, not intimidation, on an individual level. The stories you gave me might as well have been the Gracie brothers who travel in packs to keep it fair.
You admitted earlier that you put no effort into finding these stories, but what you failed to mention that you just went out and did a homework assignment that UKE gave you like a good little bitch.
DJForest was right ... You can be house broken!
Comment