Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MT: Male/Female Inequity in Tournaments?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MT: Male/Female Inequity in Tournaments?

    Male/Female Inequity in Tournaments? By Stac3y - 03-05-2009 01:55 PM

    =========

    Have any of you noticed an inequity or just weirdness in the divisions offered for women in tournaments?

    I've competed in 3 different organizations' tourneys, and here's what I've seen:

    In one of them, there is a Senior Executive (40 and up) division for men, but not for women, though they do have an Executive (32 and up) division for women. In the same org, only black belt women's divisions compete in Grand Championships, but brown belt (as well as black belt) men's divisions compete. Also, black belt women's sparring divisions only have lightweight and flyweight groups, while men have 4 groups.

    In another, the only division with money prizes is black belt men.

    In the third one, the special "big money" event is for male black belts only; and men's kata has more age divisions than women's.

    I don't think this is fair, obviously, or I wouldn't be bringing it up.

    Is this typical in the tournaments you go to (if you go to any), or is this just a geographical (Southern U.S.) thing?


    Read More ... or click reply below.
    ------------------------------
    MartialTalk.com Post Bot - Women's Self-Defense Feed

  • #2
    It's typical.

    In the recent Abu Dhabi qualifiers in Sydney, they didn't have ANY women's divisions. They have women's divisions in the actual Abu Dhabi, but if any women from Australia or New Zealand wanted to qualify, they had to fly to JAPAN to fight for the one top spot.

    Comment


    • #3
      I was just looking at some of the NASKA tournaments and it appears that the women have just as many divisions as men and also offer cash prizes.

      Comment

      Working...
      X