Originally posted by Uke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
On the mat with Jubidoo
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Uke View PostThe point being that ANY shoot or variation of a shoot is incredibly dangerous in a fight where your opponent may be armed. .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View Post
First of all, your options become limited the moment you took a knee due to lack of mobility.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View PostThere are options but none that would help you to control the weapon arm. .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View Postyou had to go even further and claim that in a situation like that you have time to decide your next move ... meaning that you won't react based on previous training, but instead you'll actually have the luxury of time to calculate, weigh and measure options .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View PostWe are speaking about shooting in on a mugger in an alleyway or on a thug in a park at night time. Whether he had a blade, a brick, a gun or a bottle you'd be fucked or at least be rushing in to get fucked up.
That was ALWAYS my point..
That was YOUR point but no one else's, and of course even that vague description involves far too many variables to make categorical statements about it.
Comment
-
First off, how funny is it that you heard jubidoo's howls for help? HoOoOoWwWwWwLlLl ...
Originally posted by Tant01What do you call a Shoot style attack from the back side of the armed suspect?
I could care less what angle it comes from. You wanna be on the ground with a man with a blade then you go right ahead. Tackling a man does not guarantee control of the weapon arm. There are better options for me. This isn't "The Last Action Hero" where people need to bust through windows and tackle every guy they fight.
I explained that there is value in that wrestling could control those who are not armed in situations where a wrestler feels safe or better yet BOLD enough to quickly close the distance like that when there is uncertainty.
Originally posted by Tant01I mean if you're not FACING the blade but you're in position to ambush from his blind side?
That's what it sounds like to me.
Originally posted by Tant01If he is between you and the blade is much better than pointy end facing your front, eh?
Originally posted by Tant01You seem expert in sharing the technique....
Originally posted by Tant01Minimize the jubashing... We all have limitations. TY
I see you haven't mentioned a thing about his tourette syndrome meltdown on the USC forum. As funny as it was, it was still uncivilized.
Sorry to hear about your pooch, Tant01. Currently I'm kicking the shit out of mine all over this forum. He needs to be broken and while its proving difficult, its fun as hell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View Post
I'd call it a sucker punch or in this case a blindside type tackle. That requires little skill and presents little danger in closing the distance because the attacker isn't even aware the tackle is coming. In that scenario a jump spinning back kick would be fine because ANYTHING that the attacker isn't prepared for or even aware of would and could work.)
Like everything you guys keep saying about knife attacks (you know, the only kind you 'allow' to happen in your theories).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uke View PostThat sounds like a scenario tailor-made for Brewer or Jubaji to writes stories meant to boast about how they executed a reckless and dangerous maneuvers .. and because they weren't killed or maimed during the execution the end justifies the means in their minds.
That's what it sounds like to me.
You and your ilk take any experience as "boasting" because you have apparently never set foot outside the LARPer Lair, and resent people for "surviving" when you theories say they 'shouldn't.'
Comment
Comment