The post I wrote yesterday (which was erased somehow before I could send) pretty much echoed what armlok wrote...albeit more diplomatically. 
Eyes, throat, groin, are all ideal targets to hit. But fine motor skills are required to hit them under pressure, and those often go right out the window when things get hairy. The story about Ted Wong using a gross motor movement (sidekick) to strike his attacker in the largest available target which presented itself is a perfect example. He had trained to do otherwise, but in the actual situation, basic tools to basic targets are what came out.
The short-armed range in which chain punches can be used doesn't lend itself to effective striking against someone who is looking to clinch. At the first sign of an attack, I am going to be covering and clinching, and looking to dominate my opponents position and balance - so that I can strike his vulnerable targets while keeping mine safe, or throw him to the ground.
I have trained in systems using chain punching, and the only time I (or anyone else I saw) was able to make it work in sparring was when that opponent was not familiar with the technique or was not ready at all. While it's true that this may exactly be the case in a "barfight" scenario - the opponent is unskilled or unready - if that's the case, wouldn't anything work? After training in both a VT/JKD type delivery system and a boxing delivery system, and I simply feel that the latter is more versitile, efficient, and effective.
"So I think one should train as seriously as one can, so that, as in this example, one doesn't just fly forward with chain punches."
I agree completely. And that training has to include sparring with progressive resistance against a non-compliant opponent, who can attack you using all the ranges. I simply don't trust myself to be able to execute "deadly" techniques that I am not able to use in sparring in an adrenaline-filled "street" situation. Because while it is true to an extent that "you fight how you train", in my experience it is even more true that you fight how you spar. That is where your true "autopilot" lies.
Best,
Jeff

Eyes, throat, groin, are all ideal targets to hit. But fine motor skills are required to hit them under pressure, and those often go right out the window when things get hairy. The story about Ted Wong using a gross motor movement (sidekick) to strike his attacker in the largest available target which presented itself is a perfect example. He had trained to do otherwise, but in the actual situation, basic tools to basic targets are what came out.
The short-armed range in which chain punches can be used doesn't lend itself to effective striking against someone who is looking to clinch. At the first sign of an attack, I am going to be covering and clinching, and looking to dominate my opponents position and balance - so that I can strike his vulnerable targets while keeping mine safe, or throw him to the ground.
I have trained in systems using chain punching, and the only time I (or anyone else I saw) was able to make it work in sparring was when that opponent was not familiar with the technique or was not ready at all. While it's true that this may exactly be the case in a "barfight" scenario - the opponent is unskilled or unready - if that's the case, wouldn't anything work? After training in both a VT/JKD type delivery system and a boxing delivery system, and I simply feel that the latter is more versitile, efficient, and effective.
"So I think one should train as seriously as one can, so that, as in this example, one doesn't just fly forward with chain punches."
I agree completely. And that training has to include sparring with progressive resistance against a non-compliant opponent, who can attack you using all the ranges. I simply don't trust myself to be able to execute "deadly" techniques that I am not able to use in sparring in an adrenaline-filled "street" situation. Because while it is true to an extent that "you fight how you train", in my experience it is even more true that you fight how you spar. That is where your true "autopilot" lies.
Best,
Jeff
Comment