no you are making it worse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
look at me in jacket it has my name on it,,my real name on it
Collapse
X
-
Three bulls heard via the grapevine that the rancher was going to bring Yet another bull onto the ranch, and the prospect raised a discussion Among them. First Bull: "Boys, we all know I've been here 5 years. Once We settled our differences, we agreed on which 100 of the cows would be Mine. Now, I don't know where this newcomer is going to get HIS cows, But I aint' givin' him any of mine." Second Bull: "That pretty much says It for me, too. I've been here 3 years and have earned my right to the 50 cows we've agreed are mine. I'll fight 'im till I run him off or kill 'im, but I'M KEEPIN' ALL MY COWS." Third Bull: "I've only been here a Year, and so far you guys have only let me have 10 cows to "take care Of." I may not be as big as you fellows (yet) but I am young and virile, So I simply MUST keep all MY cows." They had just finished their big Talk when an eighteen-wheeler pulls up in the middle of the pasture with Only ONE ANIMAL IN IT: the biggest Son- of-Another-Bull these guys had ever seen! At 4700 pounds, each step
He took toward the ground strained the steel ramp to the breaking point. First Bull: "Ahem ... You know, it's actually been some time since I Really felt I was doing all my cows justice, anyway. I think I can spare
A few for our new friend." Second Bull: "I'll have plenty of cows to take care of if I just stay on the opposite end of the pasture from HIM. I'm certainly not looking for an argument." They look over at their
Young friend, the 3rd bull, and find him pawing the dirt, shaking his Horns, and snorting. First Bull: "Son, let me give you some advice real Quick. Let him have some of your cows and live to tell about it." Third
Bull: "Sh*t, he can have ALL my cows. I'm just making sure he knows I'm A bull!!
Comment
-
My complaint about Matt Blake
I have been meaning to write this letter for some time now and, in light of recent developments, I believe it is appropriate. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of scapegoatism. Nevertheless, we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Matt Blake will promote the lie of ageism. And to overcome these fears, we must raise several issues about Matt's mawkish outbursts that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. His invectives are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction, Matt's invariant response is to force his moral code on the rest of us. In general, Matt focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, he attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings but that just goes to show that Matt keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that everything is happy and fine and good. The purpose of this deception may be to dismantle the family unit. Or maybe the purpose is to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. Oh what a tangled web Matt weaves when first he practices to deceive. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to infiltrate and then dominate and control the mass media.
Matt can't fool me. I've met directionless, obstreperous beatniks before, so I know that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to halt the adulation heaped upon petty freaks. Some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with otiose schmoes on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. When I observe Matt's helots' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like him, they all want to trade facts for fantasy, truth for myths, academics for collective socialization, and individual thinking for group manipulation. Also, while a monkey might think that Matt has answers to everything, the fact remains that if you think about it you'll see that his inane, scurrilous stances are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Matt's apostles are continuing their quiet work of advancing Matt's real goal, which is to propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright particularism. Think about it. There is every indication that Matt gives new meaning to the word "odious". Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: Matt's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of animalism and you'll see a disingenuous, harebrained cozener hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of sexism in a reckless attempt to quash other people's opinions. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Matt has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that Matt's actions are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that his legatees once used to lead people towards iniquity and sin.
Never mind that the passage of time will make it clear to even the more slow among us that Matt takes a perverse pleasure in watching people scurry about like rats in a maze, never quite managing to break the neck of his policy of sensationalism once and for all. What's really important is that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that we mustn't let him pose a threat to the survival of democracy. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
If we find the inner strength to reinforce what is best in people, then the sea of fogyism, on which Matt so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. It's not just the lunatic fringe that's in his corner; a number of previously respectable people have recently begun backing Matt. One of the things I find quite interesting is listening to other people's takes on things. For instance, I recently overheard some folks remark that it is not news that his animadversions are shrouded in a fog of clericalism. What speaks volumes, though, is that you should not ask, "Why aren't our children being warned about Matt in school?", but rather, "To what lengths will Matt go to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to subvert existing lines of power and information?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because the best thing about him is the way that he encourages us to address a number of important issues. No, wait; Matt doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, he discourages us from admitting that most people don't realize that he has already revealed his plans to impale us on the pike of favoritism. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a venal tosser. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and entirely anecdotal, but Matt should think about how his litanies lead warped dunderheads to lionize the most untrustworthy Huns I've ever seen. If Matt doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Matt's thesis is that it is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to attack everyone else's beliefs. That's thoroughly invidious, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Matt's nostrums cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that solipsism-oriented smart alecks are easily housebroken. Accompanying this recognition of the indeterminateness of verifiability with regard to an external, objective reality has been a crisis regarding our ability to know that when Matt hears anyone say that the fulminations, hijinks, and rantings that he is trying to tattoo on our minds are not educational, but frightful, his answer is to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to put to rest sententious and peremptory "compromises" such as Matt's.
To promote a herd mentality over principled, individual thought is an injustice. This seems so obvious, I am amazed there is even any discussion about it. There is absolutely nothing that cranky polluters like Matt will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some putrid incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim. His cop-outs promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Matt's sycophants because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Matt.
Even though supposedly distancing himself from pernicious slobs, Matt has really not changed his spots at all. Just like dirty clothes on the floor and cluttered closets, his mess won't go away if we simply look the other way. You may be wondering why choleric knuckle-draggers latch onto his solutions. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why the central paradox of Matt's notions, the twist that makes Matt's hariolations so irresistible to what I call vile cutthroats, is that these people truly believe that ethnocentrism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. Crazy incompetent-types like Matt are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, Matt talks a lot about vandalism and how wonderful it is. However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for something he's never defined? Apparently, even know-it-all Matt doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter much if he did, given that when I first became aware of his covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how you should never forget the three most important facets of his campaigns, namely their malignant origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.
For the moment, Matt makes no secret of the fact that I don't care what others say about him. Matt's still picayunish, conceited, and he intends to needle and wheedle treacherous con artists of one sort or another into his club. He would have us believe that things have never been better. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Matt is surrounded by pushy misers who parrot the same nonsense, which is why he is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every unimaginative ideology finds expression in Matt Blake.
Matt's epithets leave me with several unanswered questions: How can he be so lame-brained? And what exactly is his point? These are difficult questions to answer, because I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of his Pecksniffian whinges and mudslinging sound bites. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Matt has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that he parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. To those readers who believe that the best way to serve one's country is to defile the present and destroy the future, you have not been paying attention. One of Matt's former henchmen, shortly after having escaped from Matt's iron veil of monolithic thought, stated, "Matt can be so coldhearted, it would take your breath away." This comment is typical of those who have finally realized that if we are powerless to shatter the illusion that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to Matt's testy, humorless prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers, it is because we have allowed Matt to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive.
If the past is any indication of the future, Matt will once again attempt to require schoolchildren to be taught that he does the things he does "for the children". Let's be realistic: there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will honestly persist as long as Matt continues to goad blockish blowhards into hurling epithets at his enemies. Some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of his army of snooty rumormongers quite adamantly assert that masochism is the key to world peace. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could claim such a thing, but then again, a central fault line runs through each of Matt's tricks. Specifically, Matt says that noxious present-day robber barons are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery! It is disgraceful that, with a wink and a smile, Matt has signified his approval of saturnine miscreants who make empty promises. As the oft-repeated saying goes, "There are a series of options I could pursue, if necessary". The importance of that saying is that it reminds us that if Matt were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that I would never take a job working for him. Given his recalcitrant assertions, who would want to?
All in all, Matt does not merely turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. He just reported that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Matt's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to tour the country promoting exploitative diabolism in lectures and radio talk show interviews. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Comment
-
Lol, your letter sounds a bit like the lovechild of Rush and Jim Rome speaking scathingly of Howard Stern.
I'm not sure I understand ...if you really dislike him that much, why don't you just ignore him?
He's certainly not hurting anyone. Generally, I a good laugh for the day just from the way everyone else responds to him.
Comment
-
i do not know nutter
i post photo of me and sparring stuff and nutter takes and copy them
nutter copys people because nutter can't make up stuff on own
so he stell my photos
from mat blake the real matbla there is no other matbla but me
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oreomeister365
A complaint letter generator...
Lol, wow! That's great... that's the epitome of laziness.
It is the lovechild of Rush and Jim Rome.
Comment
-
Two guys in a life raft in the middle of the ocean.
One sees an old bottle floating. He picks it up and rubs it, and a genie comes out.
The genie says, "For letting me out, I will grant you one wish."
The guy says, (without thinking) "Turn this ocean into beer". And the ocean turns into the best beer anybody has ever tasted.
The second guy says to the first, "You idiot, now we'll have to piss in the boat".
Comment
-
i am 39 stop the ____ fun it it's not funny any more
you need to get back to my topic and i was born 1/13/67
in ct. please answer my topics the way you should answer them
everones topics please be kind
some of you make me sick and to think this board talks this way
what if a 8 year old read the topic
i am 39 and understand but if some one is 8 they would not know what to think
from matt blake
Comment
-
The owner of a drug store walks in to find a guy leaning heavily against a wall. The owner asks the clerk, "What's with that guy over there by the wall?"
The clerk says, "Well, he came in here this morning to get something for his cough. I couldn't find the cough syrup, so I gave him an entire bottle of laxative."
The owner says, "You idiot! You can't treat a cough with laxatives!"
The clerk says, "Oh yeah? Look at him, he's afraid to cough!"
Comment
Comment