Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It begins...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    "honest"?

    You seem to be laboring under the impression that your personal partisan speculation rises to the level of a crucial reality that cannot be ignored.




    You are speculating. You are positing things that are not reality, and then demanding that I agree with both your political bias and your imagination or I'm not being "honest". Wtf

    Look, your particular bias is very clear. I got it, check, roger, clear, ok. Put it on an f-ing T-shirt for all I care.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by jubaji
      and you just posted cute black and white pictures and told me stories about your Uncle Earl or whoever

      Juabji anyone who read or would review that pitbull thread can clearly see now that you are full of yourself, In the pitbull thread I also posted studies with statistics done by animal industry proffessionals; vets, prof. dog trainers and the like who share my opinion, Along with my own 15+ years with pitbulls, which is why your generalization about pitbull owners is untrue and insulting to me. What a fool I was to assume you had the humility to examine another point of view. I guess I gave you too much credit, I wont make that mistake again.
      You would try here to portray me as some Ignorant nostalgic hick, instead of just someone whose life experiances differ from your own, if you have any that relate to actual working dogs.
      Not that it matters because your biased arrogant attitude would not allow you to even examine the links I posted.

      And yet once again you ignore my entire post except to reflect back and make ANOTHER attempt at insulting someone and ignoring the thread topic.

      It must save you alot of thinking Jubaji to paint the world with such broad strokes. Gives you more time to think up sarcastic remarks and dissect posts for ammunition to launch more personal attacks. The reason I was so persistant was I wanted to give you chance to actually discuss the thread topic but I guess demeaning people online is more your idea of fun. Speaks volumes about your personality In my opinion.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by GonzoStyles
        Juabji anyone who read or would review that pitbull thread can clearly see now that you are full of yourself, In the pitbull thread I also posted studies with statistics

        Instead of being dishonest here, if you have more to add to that post go back and add it.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by GonzoStyles

          And yet once again you ignore my entire post except to reflect back and make ANOTHER attempt at insulting someone and ignoring the thread topic.

          .

          I have not ignored the topic. I am looking at the thread topic in a realistic way, something you cannot claim.


          If you feel insulted, that's your problem.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by jubaji
            Instead of being dishonest here, if you have more to add to that post go back and add it.

            You are accusing me of being dishonest about my post content in the pitbull thread??

            Please Jubaji, ANOTHER personal attack?

            In that thread I posted links, studies and statistics gathered by proffesionals that agree with my stance on the pitbull breed, including a list of organizations that are dedicated to educating people like yourself,
            but you being more interested in attacking someone on a personal level,
            never bothered to look at them obviously.

            I could add more but why bother? You would simply attempt to insult me instead of actually discussing the points I make, as you have done in this thread.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by GonzoStyles
              You are accusing me of being dishonest about my post content in the pitbull thread?? .

              Yes. If you'd like to continue that losing battle, go back there and do it.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by jubaji
                I have not ignored the topic. I am looking at the thread topic in a realistic way, something you cannot claim.
                Really ?? posting that I have no place to second guess lawyers, and that my opinion is nothing but tired spin? THAT is what you call looking at a topic in a "realistic" way? Those are the only replys that you have made in this thread that even address the the original topic, compare that to your endless posts to prove someones partisanship, and anyone can see what your true interest in this forum is.

                Personal attack, it constitutes the bulk of your efforts here.

                I posted several points that according to you were subject to interpretation,
                yet you chose to ignore them repeatdly, instead offering a patronizing personal attack as if American citizens have no place to question anyone in the government. Maybe you trust politicians to tell the truth, but mamma didnt raise no fool here Jubaji.

                What I attempted to do by listing various aspects of the incident was giving you a chance to "interpret" them and show me what your take of the incident was. But you thought it would be easier to try and demean me with an attempt to discredit me.

                The act of a partisan bootlicker, In my humble opinion.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by jubaji
                  Yes. If you'd like to continue that losing battle, go back there and do it.
                  Funny that STILL ignore the evidence I posted trying now to claim that I lost the battle. Hardly

                  I have thousands of pitbull owners, quite a few veterinarians, and some of the worlds best dog trainers with the same belief, hell even the "Dog Whisperer" shares my opinion on pitbulls!

                  While your opinion is shared with PETA, I think I like my company better than yours.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by GonzoStyles
                    I have thousands of pitbull owners, quite a few veterinarians, and some of the worlds best dog trainers with the same belief, hell even the "Dog Whisperer" shares my opinion .

                    Is there some reason you are afraid to take this business where it belongs? Afraid to be that close to the actual scientifically compiled data I provided again?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by GonzoStyles
                      mamma didnt raise no fool here Jubaji..

                      Really? Who did she leave you with?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by GonzoStyles
                        Really ?? posting that I have no place to second guess lawyers, and that my opinion is nothing but tired spin? THAT is what you call looking at a topic in a "realistic" way? .

                        Look, that issue is a matter of interpreting the law. The law is not based on your feelings. Rest assured that every liberal lawyer in DC is salivating over the idea of 'getting' something on the administration, so if there is a legal recourse I'm confident they will pursue it. Beyond that, what are we left with? Playing "is not" "is too" forever? Its pointless.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Jubaji your a sad case you cant resist it can you? You had to throw out a personal shot, thanks for validating my opinion of you.

                          Why didnt you take your partisanship debate to private messages?

                          Do you run this forum?

                          I would if you could actually discuss a topic.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by GonzoStyles
                            Jubaji your a sad case you cant resist it can you? You had to throw out a personal shot, thanks for validating my opinion of you.

                            .

                            Come on now, if you're gonna throw up a softball like that.......

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by jubaji
                              Look, that issue is a matter of interpreting the law. The law is not based on your feelings. Rest assured that every liberal lawyer in DC is salivating over the idea of 'getting' something on the administration, so if there is a legal recourse I'm confident they will pursue it. Beyond that, what are we left with? Playing "is not" "is too" forever? Its pointless.

                              THAT IS WHY I POSTED ITEMS FOR YOU TO CONTEST

                              which you havent, you retreat into the "let your betters handle this" defense
                              and refuse to even touch the topic of the thread.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Do you know something that the liberal legal experts don't?

                                Originally posted by GonzoStyles
                                THAT IS WHY I POSTED ITEMS FOR YOU TO CONTEST
                                .

                                Ugh...are you suffering from short-term memory loss? You have admitted you are not a legal expert, I have admitted I am not a legal expert. Legal experts (of all political persuasions) have looked at this thing inside and out and thus far found nothing to charge someone with a crime over. That's it.

                                If more evidence comes to light that changes the situation, then maybe there will be something worth discussing, but until and unless that happens...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X