Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China admits taking, burying US POW

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • China admits taking, burying US POW

    WASHINGTON - After decades of denials, the Chinese have acknowledged burying an American prisoner of war in China, telling the U.S. that a teenage soldier captured in the Korean War died a week after he "became mentally ill," according to documents provided to The Associated Press.


    China had long insisted that all POW questions were answered at the conclusion of the war in 1953 and that no Americans were moved to Chinese territory from North Korea. The little-known case of Army Sgt. Richard G. Desautels, of Shoreham, Vt., opens another chapter in this story and raises the possibility that new details concerning the fate of other POWs may eventually surface.

    Chinese authorities gave Pentagon officials intriguing new details about Desautels in a March 2003 meeting in Beijing, saying they had found "a complete record of 9-10 pages" in classified archives.

    Until now, this information had been kept quiet; a Pentagon spokesman said it was intended only for Desautels' family members. The details were provided to Desautels' brother, Rolland, who passed them to a POW-MIA advocacy group, the National Alliance of Families, which gave them to AP this week.

    In a telephone interview Thursday, the brother said he did not follow up on the information he got in 2003 because he did not believe it. He was not aware it marked the first time China had acknowledged taking a U.S. POW from North Korea into Chinese territory or burying an American there.

    Two months after the March 2003 meeting, the Pentagon office responsible for POW-MIA issues sent Rolland Desautels a brief written summary of what a Chinese army official had related about the case.

    "According to the Chinese, Sgt. Desautels became mentally ill on April 22, 1953, and died on April 29, 1953," the summary said. It added that he had been buried in a Chinese cemetery but the grave was moved during a construction project "and there is no record of where Desautels' remains were reinterred."

    The reported circumstance of Desautels' death — sudden mental illness — may sound improbable. But the key revelation — that he was taken from North Korea to a city in northeastern China and then buried — matches long-held U.S. suspicions about China's handling, or mishandling, of American POWs during and after the war.

    It raises the possibility that wartime Chinese records could shed light on the fate of other U.S. captives who were known to be held in Chinese-run POW camps but did not return when the fighting ended in 1953.

    And it appears to undercut the Pentagon's public stance that China returned all POWs it held inside China. The Pentagon has focused more on the related issue of China's management of POW camps inside North Korea during the war, which Chinese troops entered in the fall of 1950 on North Korea's side.

    Desautels' reported burial site — the city of Shenyang, formerly known as Mukden — is interesting because it is far from the North Korean border and was often cited in declassified U.S. intelligence reports as the site of one or more prisons holding hundreds of American POWs from Korea. Some U.S. reports referred to Mukden as a possible transshipment point for POWs headed to Russia.

    Desautels was an 18-year old corporal, a member of A Company, 2nd Engineer Battalion, 2nd Infantry Division, when his unit encountered a swarming Chinese assault near Kunu-ri, North Korea, on Dec. 1, 1950. According to a Pentagon account, Desautels and his fellow captives were marched north to a POW compound known as Camp 5, near Pyoktong, on the North Korean side of the border with China.

    Subsequent events are a bit fuzzy, but Desautels was moved among prison camps and apparently was used by the Chinese army as a truck driver. A number of U.S. POWs told American interrogators after their release from captivity that they had seen Desautels alive and well in Camp 5.

    One who said he spent four months with Desautels said that in March 1952 Desautels said that if he should disappear, others should make inquiries with the proper military authorities. Numerous returned POWs said Desautels had spent several months inside China before being returned to Camp 5 in 1952.

    Rolland Desautels, 81, recalls his older brother as "a strong character who came off the farm," enlisted in the Army at age 17 and was stationed at Fort Lewis, Wash., before being shipped to Korea in August 1950, two months after the war began with North Korea's invasion of the South.

    The Pentagon has taken an interest in the Desautels case for many years. A June 1998 Pentagon cable to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing said the case was one of several on which China should be pushed to provide answers, that "we believe the Chinese should be able to account for these individuals."

    Now it turns out that China did provide an accounting, although it is incomplete and was kept under wraps for five years.

    Larry Greer, a spokesman for the POW-MIA office at the Pentagon, said Thursday that although U.S. officials asked to see the 9-10 page file on Desautels, China has yet to provide it or additional information.

    Mark Sauter, an author and researcher on the subject of POWs from the Korean War, said in an interview that Beijing authorities are to be commended for finally providing useful information.

    "The case of Sgt. Desautels has been a focal point of a six-decade cover-up by the Chinese government," Sauter said. "This is the first crack in the dike. From what we can tell, the Pentagon has not aggressively followed up, either on the Desautels case or those of hundreds of other Americans for whom the Chinese should be able to account."

    American officials believed from the earliest days of the armistice that concluded the Korean War without a formal peace treaty in July 1953 that the Chinese and North Koreans withheld a number of U.S. POWs, possibly in retaliation for U.S. refusal to repatriate those Chinese and North Korean POWs who chose not to be returned to their home country out of fear of retribution.

    Gen. Mark W. Clark, the American commander of U.S.-led forces during the final stages of the Korean War, wrote in a 1954 account that "we had solid evidence" that hundreds of captive Americans were held back by the Chinese and North Koreans, possibly as leverage to gain a China seat on the U.N. Security Council.

    Over time, however, U.S. officials muted their concerns, while periodically pressing the Chinese in private. Publicly, the Pentagon's stance today is that China returned all the U.S. POWs it held.

    "Some U.S. POWs spent time across the (Yalu) river in Manchuria, but to the best of our knowledge, all have returned," the Pentagon's POW/MIA office says in a summary of wartime POW camps.

    AP: China admits taking, burying US POW - Yahoo! News


    Our leaders have known about this since 2003 and tried to suppress it, once again we have proof they're lying about the POW situation.

    This is no different than the official position on the Vietnam POW situation and the lies told by McCain, Kerry, Kissinger etc etc.

  • #2
    copy and paste

    Comment


    • #3
      ........

      ......................................

      Comment


      • #4
        POW's left behind in every war

        National Alliance Of Families
        For the Return of America's Missing Servicemen
        + World War II + Korea + Cold War + Vietnam + Gulf War




        Forward
        by James D. Sanders
        Co-Author, Soldier's of Misfortune
        Co-Author, The Men We Left Behind


        The Department of Defense knew that 99,101 American POWs were reported by the Germans to have been captured and placed in the German prison camp system during World War II [1] Only 91,255 returned. By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force iuf necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage Amercan POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control.

        As early as 1948, the United States began to receive reports of American POWs enslaved in Siberia, some building tanks for the Soviet Army. Photos of young American soldiers, in uniform, taken before the now enslaved Americans departed to fight the Nazi's, were smuggled out of the gulag. On the back of some of the photos was the name and address of these Americans, enslaved because of a failed foreign policy.[2]

        Siberian camps for World War II American and British POWs were observed into the 1960s by Soviet MVD Colonel Vladimir Makarovich.

        Task Force Russia (TFR), in 1992 developed information on at least three "Soviet NKVD Camps for Eonglish-speaking people (Moscow 024353)," [3] Camp 27 (Krasnodar); Camp 64 (Tambov), Camp 4B (Ivanov "and any other corollary facilities.")[4]

        Two documents surfaced at the National Archives related to American (and English) POWs at Tambov. On December 10, 1945, the American Embassy in Moscow received the following message:

        Information received here that as of 30 August 1945 the Russians were holding prisoner approximately 45 American enlisted men and two officers, one captain and on lieutenant, at Rada near Tambov in the Stalingrad area. Prisoners were reported in barbed wire under guard.[5]



        One week later the OSS received Tambov information from a Pole who had been captured by the Russians in 1944. In April 1945 he was placed in a Soviet prison camp at Tambov with "several score Americans" as well as "Englishmen." The "Englishmen and Americans asked him urgently to notify the Allied authorities of their plight."[6]

        Maria Il'inichna Filippova worked in this camp's registration office. In 1992 she confirmed that "she encountered American and British names while going through the questionaire that each prisoner had to fill out." And, an NKVD officer who was assigned to this camp between 1943-46, Aleksei Nikolaevich Lobanov, "remembers that there were usually a relatively small number of Americans there."[7]

        On April 28, 1945, NKVD troops were given written instructions "to confine American citizens in Camp 188 [Rada]." On May 11th, Major Yusichev, senior NKVD officer at Rada, received a message that there were "2,500 French. . . American and British POWs who will arrive shortly."[8]

        Roger Koehren, a French POW held by the Soviets at Tambov after the war ended, recalled that:

        With me in barrack(quarantine) number one, there were American and English aviators. They had all been held in German Stalags or in eastern Gernamy and were, like the Alsacians, gathered at Tambov to be repatriated. I do not know what happened to these poor pilots, they were not repatriated with us at the end of 1945.[9]



        As the clouds of Government cover-up appeared on the horizon in the early 1990s, Paul M. Cole, Ph.D, was hired by Dod to write the Government version of possible Soviet retention of American POWs after World War II. This "report" was financed at taxpayer expense under DoD contract number MDA903-90-C-0004. It can best be described as an excellent example of bureaucratic obfuscation of a fifty-year old cover-up.

        In order to create an alleged scholarly defense of the bureaucracy, Dr. Cole was forced to ignore Battle Casualties of the Army, found in the National Arhives Record Group 407. These are World War II records prepared by the Machine Records Branch, Office of the Adjutant General (under direction of the Statistics Branch), for the War Department General Staff. The records state that the Germans reported the capture of 99,101 Americans before their reporting system broke down in March, 1945.

        But the United States Government cannot use 99,101 known POWs as the official number because only 91,255 returned. [10] And, more than 8,000 of these returnees were POWs captured after the German reporting system broke down.[11] In other words, only 83,000 Americans caputred by the Germans and reported through the Swiss Red Cross to the United States government, returned after the war. Worse yet, no Nazi scapegoats were hanged for this loss of thousands of Americans.

        The government solution in 1945, and again in 1992, was to allege that only 76,854 POWs were "estimated" to be held by the Germans as of March 15, 1945.[12] The Germans actually captured 77,120 U.S. Army personnel in the European theater. This is the figure upon which the Government "estimate" is based, and it is a deliberate deception because there were also 20,277 Americans captured in the Mediterranean theater as well as 1,704 captured in the early fighting in North Africa, for a total of 99,101.[13]

        Paul Cole, using the 76,854 to anchor his reasoning, concluded: "For it to be true that about 23,000 American POWs were liberated from Nazi German camps, transferred to USSR territory and never repatriated, all of the following must be true:

        1. That the entire historical record, including the RAMP's report, has been falsified. . . . [14]
        2. That Supreme Allied Headquarters deliberately distorted estimates of Americans in Nazi camps following the first day of the Normandy invasion to arrive at a final March 1945 estimate. . . .
        3. That the Soviets had at one time in their custody approximately 56,500 American POWs, 23,000 of whom were not estimated as POWs by Allied Headquarters, were not carried as POWs in German records, and all of whom were successfully transported to and imprisoned in the USSR without a trace. . . .[15]

        6. That the reporting of the post-war U.S. Army "psypool" program, designed to collect information on Americans in Soviet custody in the 1950s, was tampered with. . . .[N]ot a single live sighting was received.[16]

        As earlier proved, RAMPs has in fact been falsified. Supreme Allied Headquarters did deliberately, after the fact, conveniently forget than an additional 21,981 American POWs were captured in the Mediterranean and North African theaters.

        Paul Cole's point six, above, is fabricated and without serious merit. See Soldiers of Misfortune, chapters 9 and 11 for a discussion of the significant documentation available on World War II American POWs in the gulag. One of them, Sergeant Jim Patrick, surfaced in Moscow in June 1992. His story was published in Pravda on June 11, 1992, on page 2. DIA has, to date, stonewalled all efforts to obtain Sergeant Jim Patrick's debriefing report and final disposition.

        And, the United States Government refuses to declassify thousands of World War II documents from AFHQ files--all related to "Russian matters," POW exchanges and forcible repatriation.

        Why would the United States go to the extreme measure of fraudulently using taxpayer money to rebury a fifty-year old cover-up? Because the events that ocurred at the end of World War II opened the door for Soviet and Communist Bloc retention of American POWs during the Korean, Cold and Vietnam Wars.

        If the public knew precisely what happened in 1945, there could be no doubt about the fate of Americans lost in more recent wars. Nor could there be any doubt about the veracity of government statements and actions since the Vietnam war ended with the abandonment of hundreds of American POWs held in the Vietnamese second tier prison system, hostages to Hanoi's demand for payment of war reparations.

        WWII Home Page, National Alliance of Families

        Every American who claims to be a patriot needs to demand the truth and bring our boys home. IF McCain wants my vote he's going to have to admit he lied and reopen the books on POWs, this may be their last hope of ever coming home. Don't stand by and do nothing while they rot in foreign prison camps, they fought for your freedom, what will you do for theirs?

        Comment

        Working...
        X