Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Black Panthers using intimidation to stop white voters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by darrianation View Post
    From theur website:



    Black Panther index page

    Sounds like the same ol' Black Panther ideology to me.
    Nah, you got the old Black Panther Party. That particular organization was pretty much destroyed by COINTELPRO. This is the New Black Panther party here


    Welcome to the Official Website of The New Black Panther Party for Self Defense

    Hey look! They are against taxation too!

    "We believe our people should be exempt from ALL TAXATION as long as we are deprived of equal justice under the laws of the land "

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Uke View Post
      In all fairness, these Panthers are NOT the same as the original Panthers. I'm not even sure that their ideals are the same.
      The Clan made the same claim at one point too.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Mr. Arieson
        Jubaji, he actually thinks you, me and Mike Brewer are the same person. He thinks I am playing the role of the democrat.

        You and me the same person? That's crazy!!


        "Methinks the lady doth protest too much"

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by kingoftheforest View Post
          The Clan made the same claim at one point too.
          Nah, the Klan isn't the same terrorist group they were in the past. No more cross burnings in people's yards, or murder and lynchings to keep people from voting. Now they sit around whining about losing their "whiiite riiiice"

          Comment


          • #65
            pUke has run off again already. What a surprise. At least we still have the Braidy Twins to entertain us.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by TTEscrima
              Reasonable retreat and CCW are fine, but there is a difference in the training required to protect yourself and perhaps your family, and a completely different type of training to protect a room full 50 or 60 screaming kids that adjoins rooms full of other screaming kids vulnerable to rounds passing through the walls.

              Add in the school teachers themselves, how many are the type of person to even own a gun, much less use it on a child? It isn't the population that's in question, it's the type of people who become school teachers in the first place being asked to bring guns to school to shoot children (if need be) that's the issue. To say that school teachers are usually not exactly pro gun and pro war types is an understatement, thus any plan based on arming them to protect out children is based on wishful thinking rather than clear evaluation of what the reality is.
              Can't be said any better.

              In the way darrianation puts it, it would be "teaching the enemy". Every single student would be viewed as a potential target. There would be a heightened sense of paranoia. School programs would suffer in the same way our health care system suffers due to exorbitant insurance premiums. And let's not forget about escalation. Teacher bring in guns. Students will start bring guns. Teachers start shooting students. Parents start shooting teachers. Teachers begin getting death threats and violence at home. Teachers quit and we have no more public schools for our children.

              Its a poor thought out idea from the beginning.

              It all sounds good to some people until they find out that it was their child that was shot because he did something that the teacher equated to danger. Then watch how fast the tune changes. You'll hear a lot of "not my child" and "my child would never...".

              People who think like that ought to seriously look into homeschooling.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by jubaji View Post
                pUke has run off again already. What a surprise. At least we still have the Braidy Twins to entertain us.
                I don't run off. I just post when I feel like it. Unlike you and your obession with hugging Brewer's nuts and this site, I have better things to do. All of your d!ckheaded nonsense is insignificant. And you know it which is why you have to howl at the moon so loudly, mongrel.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Uke View Post
                  For those of you who disagree with that you must not know who's coming to dinner at the White House on January 20.
                  ....Snoop?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by mellow View Post
                    "whiiite riiiice"
                    is great with suracha sauce and tom kha gai...
                    power rice...to get you ready to work that double shift...

                    just don't call it white power rice, because people get the wrong idea.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by pUke View Post
                      I don't run off.

                      You always run off. You pop in just long enough to humiliate yourself yet again and then run off until you forget. Pathetic.


                      So, what is the deal with the "mongrel" thing? What's the code?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X