Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush good or bad?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Toudiyama[NL]

    It scares me that a person believing in a 6 day creation ( not the day were just 1 day) can fire the most powerfull arsenal in the world
    Now I'm scared.

    Comment


    • #47
      And I remain confused....

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Szczepankiewicz
        It's pretty clear by your post that you understand neither politics, warfare, or economics. But thanks for playing....

        Meaning these should be ruled by double standards?
        It's normal not to pay your debts or not pay your contribution and still expect others to stick to the agreement?
        It's normal that you can no longer make an agreement with a gouverment that will only be in the office for less then a year because his succesor will not abbide tot the agreement?

        If it is, then yes, I do not understand politics

        Comment


        • #49
          President Bush

          Presiden Bush is a good president, he dealt with the Terrorism thing very well. So Lizard. Imagine what that Al Gore gay dude would do if he was wearing Bush's shoes. He would have gone off and done Clinton. He was a pussy and would have been a bad leader during the Terrorism Crisis.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: President Bush

            Originally posted by Loor
            Presiden Bush is a good president, he dealt with the Terrorism thing very well. So Lizard. Imagine what that Al Gore gay dude would do if he was wearing Bush's shoes. He would have gone off and done Clinton. He was a pussy and would have been a bad leader during the Terrorism Crisis.
            You're 14, or so you said in another post. Therefore your opinion on political matters is, well, probably quite a bit uninformed. I am rather curious, for instance, how you felt he dealt with the "Terrorism thing" very well? Last I checked the Taliban (which, btw, had nothing to actually do with 9/11) had regrouped and was running freely throughout Afghanistan. Last I checked Bin Laden (funny, you don't hear much about him anymore, do you?) was still running around freely. Most of the major and worrisome terrorist groups, Hamas, Islamic Jihaad, Hizbollah (all of whom have threatened American interests if they don't like how the events in Israel/Palestine unfold...) still operate freely with state sponsorship. Major terrorist training camps, which host Al Qaeda, still operate in Lebannon. I could continue all day. Why? Because, contrary to the belief of the ignorant masses, Bush has never actually addressed terrorism. Not even Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda's state sponsors (and terrorist groups have state sponsors, Bin Laden is not that wealthy on his own...) are Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have never been really chastised by the Bush administration. So they continue to pour money into terrorist groups. Iran, who we have sort of puffed up our chests at but not really threatened, funds many, many terrorist groups (unlike Iraq--Saddam actually never seemed to be a big sponsor of terrorism). So all the REAL threats to our safety still remain. Just because a thousand Muslims are rotting away in outdoor cages in Cuba does not make us any safer. The fact is, if terrorism was Bush's concern then he should have fough Saudi, Pakistan, Iran and Syria all before going into Iraq and Afghanistan. But you wouldn't know that, because you call it the "Terrorist thing".

            As for what Gore would have done, well its difficult to say. This shows your naivette. The President only sets the agenda to a degree. Gore's agenda would have been set in large part by the composition of his Cabinet, the composition of Congress, and whatever special interests groups were largely responsible for putting him in office. Oil and energy interests put Bush in office. This is reflected quite obviously in the actions of his Administration. Maybe the more media savvy Gore would have gotten big money from, oh, the RIAA and his first order of business would have been to stomp out media piracy. So there would be tons of Kazaa using teenagers rotting in Gitmo and his first war would have been against the hotbeds of music and movie piracy in Asia. Hell if I know; but neither do you. To claim that the former Vice President of the United States would be off having sex with the former President of the United States, is, however, a bit slanderous, don't you think? Beyond that, Clinton was most certainly heterosexual. I mean, hey, you might not like Monica, but you've got to give the man props for getting BJs at work. Now that's a President.

            Oh, yeah, and lastly, I ought to mention this. You might want to check out government spending and deficeit during Clinton and during this Administration. That might enlighten you a little.

            Comment


            • #51
              lol "claps"

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Re: President Bush

                Originally posted by RobertG

                Oh, yeah, and lastly, I ought to mention this. You might want to check out government spending and deficeit during Clinton and during this Administration. That might enlighten you a little.
                Also check out the state of the US economy. Nationwide, our unemployment level is 6.4%. The figure for the state of Texas is 7.6%.

                6.4% seems minute, but assuming our workforce includes 160 million Americans, thats 10.24 million people out of work.

                This isn't necessarily President Bush's fault, but the sad things is that the only thing he has done is pander to his political interests. You would imagine that as an ex-oil man, he would address the issue with the American people, especially the state of Texas.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: President Bush

                  Originally posted by Loor
                  Mr Gore is a silly gay poopy pants . I like bush because he made the terrorism thing go away. weeeee!
                  Perhaps you could back up these claims with some evidence. Do some research or something. A brilliant response by robertG.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    All you REALLY need to know about Gore played out in his "home" state of Tn. He LOST his home state. His extended family (cousins) were on TV wearing Bush T-shirts carrying Bush signs. His FAMILY was out campaining against this man. What else do you need to know? I cann't think of one of my family members I'd be campaining against.

                    The man was scum as a Rep, Senator, and VP. He is still scum and will always be scum.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by grimel
                      All you REALLY need to know about Gore played out in his "home" state of Tn. He LOST his home state. His extended family (cousins) were on TV wearing Bush T-shirts carrying Bush signs. His FAMILY was out campaining against this man. What else do you need to know? I cann't think of one of my family members I'd be campaining against.

                      The man was scum as a Rep, Senator, and VP. He is still scum and will always be scum.
                      This poll (terrible though it may be) is about GW Bush. Al Gore doesn't have anything to do with this. You think that if al gore is bad it automaticaly makes Bush good? They could BOTH be poopy pants.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Funny thing is how people who belong to the G.W.Bush sect considder any negative talk about the president as unpatriotic but it was these same people who were talking trash about Clinton.
                        Do Republicans think they have more rights than Democrats or something??

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Do Republicans think they have more rights than Democrats or something??

                          -No. I think republicans right now hegemonically control the image of the U.S. For example, everyone I know who has an American flag sticker on their car is Republican. At republican rallies, people are adorn in American flag costumes. I was, however, proud to see my neighbor put up a ton of American flags are her lawn, but on her door is a sticker for "code pink-women against military madness". So it is good to see that there are some who can profess to be proud Americans, but can also be for peace, unlike some republicans (like the Bush administration) who think that war is the way to get things done and is the American way.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            well looks like we are going to war with north korea soon. lol. i really wish bush was out of office. i don't even think bush is the president i think his advisors are president. i knew we shouldn't have been so quick to get in iraq.

                            well i wish you all luck on avoiding the nucs and the same goes for the ones in the u.k.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              In the event of a nuclear attack, ALL warring nations will nuke the uk to calibrate their missiles.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                wasn't Bush a cheerleader at Yale? I think he should chose Kevin Green as vice president

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X