If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Meh dude the Army uses the 3:1 ratio. We allways attack with 3:1 odds. China is like 3:10000000000000 there is no way we are goiong to touch China. Iraq name a country with a Tyrant at that point in time doing the same thing as Sadam. and we didnt sell Iraq their Chem and Bio weapons, they made and or got them on their own.
you missed my point, we didnt attack china on DEC 8th because they werent to blame for dec 7th...Iraq was NOT to blame for SEPT 11th...but we goy ALOT of Bush-lip to the contrary.
There are plenty of places where human rights violations are HORRIBLE but there are no resources to reap, no daimonds to mine, no religious artifacts to sell and no oil ....there are also no rich white nations helping them out...
waiting for more of your dishonest, paranoid, bullshit...
Originally posted by BoarSpear
...Iraq was NOT to blame for SEPT 11th...but we goy ALOT of Bush-lip to the contrary.
I'd be interested to see the evidence you have of President Bush ever saying that Iraq was directly responsible for the attacks of 9/11.
If you are referring to the fact that Iraq is a central aspect of the war on terror that we were awakened to by the attacks of 9/11, then that's a different matter.
I'd be interested to see the evidence you have of President Bush ever saying that Iraq was directly responsible for the attacks of 9/11.
If you are referring to the fact that Iraq is a central aspect of the war on terror that we were awakened to by the attacks of 9/11, then that's a different matter.
Isn't it?
Excuse me, but Bush did try to point the finger at Saddam and so did his cronies...
I know Boar i didnt miss the point i just ment that China was a bad example.
nah china was the perfect example... China was about as responsible for Dec 7th as Iraq was for Sept 11th ....we went after the little guy...Like you said though china would have spanked our ass...see the korean conflict
We went after a little guy Saddam and let the big fish off the hook...Remember a guy called Osama? The saudi's are also a major source of MONEY and DANGEROUS RELIGIOUS teachings that promote war with the west...had we went the hard road and dealt with the real issues fine...We didnt, we are doing another political tap dance paid for with American blood.
We're still looking for Osama, by the way. And rememebr that Osama said that the very first aim of Al Qaeda was the expulsion of the US from the Saudi Kingdom! Going into Saudi with guns blazing would have been foolhardy. It would be an economic gut punch, but it would justify OBL's cause line by line. You wanna talk terrorist recruitment poster? Go back and read some of al-Qaeda's very first "mission statements." Suggesting that we go to war with Saudi Arabia plays directly into the hands of those terrorists who wanted to destroy us in the first place - especially if you do it before you can secure Iraq, Iran, and Syria...
When's the last time you played "Risk?"
Oh yeah you bet your ass we're still looking for Osama. Just because the News doesnt know whats going on and hasnt said anything doesnt mean that Special Forces are'nt on the ground hunting his ass along with Delta.
We're still looking for Osama, by the way. And rememebr that Osama said that the very first aim of Al Qaeda was the expulsion of the US from the Saudi Kingdom! Going into Saudi with guns blazing would have been foolhardy. It would be an economic gut punch, but it would justify OBL's cause line by line. You wanna talk terrorist recruitment poster? Go back and read some of al-Qaeda's very first "mission statements." Suggesting that we go to war with Saudi Arabia plays directly into the hands of those terrorists who wanted to destroy us in the first place - especially if you do it before you can secure Iraq, Iran, and Syria...
When's the last time you played "Risk?"
Ah ha...Yeah you think i dont know that?? I just wanted you to admit what you just said...We cant deal with the saudis until we.... like i said this is the beginning of WW3. People act like its winding down....Man it aint even heated up yet...
yes i have played risk...(not lately though...right now its Go and stratego)....you ever played russian roulette?.....What about with nuclear weapons? Thats where this is headed...in fact i think all this debate is silly...the balls rolling downhill with too much momentum...the only way this ends is with a Bang.
Are you going to deny the money and fundamentalist crap certain segments of the saudi's blatantly spend that is anti Israel and america?
Personaly i dont think anyone is gona nuke anyone. We all love our money and life too much to use a nuke. They all know if anyone uses a nuke the world will end thus we will continue to use anything but nukes to win.
Oh yeah you bet your ass we're still looking for Osama. Just because the News doesnt know whats going on and hasnt said anything doesnt mean that Special Forces are'nt on the ground hunting his ass along with Delta.
i didnt say we havent spent expended billions of dollars and gallons of blood looking for him...and i didnt say we wouldnt keep on spending those same resources...i said we havent found him...thats pretty amazing to me...imagine how long ANY american politician would last before another one sold him out...shit look at watergate or any other political scandal. how much were we offering for info leading to his arrest? HEHEHE Cheney would put dubya in a limo and delliver him to you with a bow on his head for half of what i remember being offered.
Excuse me, but Bush did try to point the finger at Saddam and so did his cronies...
Originally Posted by jubaji
I'd be interested to see the evidence you have of President Bush ever saying that Iraq was directly responsible for the attacks of 9/11.
If you are referring to the fact that Iraq is a central aspect of the war on terror that we were awakened to by the attacks of 9/11, then that's a different matter.
Personaly i dont think anyone is gona nuke anyone. We all love our money and life too much to use a nuke. They all know if anyone uses a nuke the world will end thus we will continue to use anything but nukes to win.
SANE people wont use NUKES...religious wackos who believe their reward comes in the next life however WILL...in fact those idiots believe its gods will and they are doing his work and will be rewarded for it in the "afterlife"
They are morons ... if you believe in a creator, why would he be happy you broke his ant farm? you assume he prefers you red ants over the black ants he made as well some how the red ants believe they are "gods ants"...so who made the black ones? arent they his ants too? anyone who will kill you over their religious beliefs is a mental midget...beware.
Originally Posted by jubaji
I'd be interested to see the evidence you have of President Bush ever saying that Iraq was directly responsible for the attacks of 9/11.
If you are referring to the fact that Iraq is a central aspect of the war on terror that we were awakened to by the attacks of 9/11, then that's a different matter.
Isn't it?
JUBAJI if you never heard or saw bush or his admin try to point the finger or claim visits to Iraq by al qaeda then it must have been on the news after your mommy sent you to bed, because the rest of the nation damn sure saw it.
Comment