Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sex Facts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sex Facts

    REALLY?


    By ANAHAD O'CONNOR

    Published: August 31, 2004

    THE CLAIM -- Sex before an athletic event can hinder performance.


    THE FACTS -- No one knows exactly when it got started, but the idea that athletes should abstain from sex before a crucial game has been a golden rule of sports for centuries. Pliny the Elder may have been the first to draw a link, but with a positive spin. ''Athletes when sluggish are revitalized by lovemaking,'' he wrote in A.D. 77.

    More than a millennium later, however, it has become routine for coaches in almost every sport to forbid their players to have sex before game night, to conserve energy and increase aggression. Boxers like Lennox Lewis and Muhammad Ali have said they would go without sex for weeks before a big fight.

    But perhaps the only scientific study to investigate the claim directly found that it was a myth. In 1995, Dr. Tommy Boone of the College of St. Scholastica in Duluth, Minn., measured athletic performance in 11 men after they had intercourse the night before and then, on another day, after they had abstained the night before.

    The subjects were given a treadmill test, a routine measure of athletic endurance. Each subject's peak performance was the same on both days, suggesting that sex the night before had not slowed them down, Dr. Boone said.

    As for aggression, in 1999 Italian scientists found that testosterone levels in men climbed as sexual activity increased, suggesting that more rendezvous in the bedroom might lead to higher rates of aggression the next day -- and enhance athletic performance.

    THE BOTTOM LINE -- Sex does not impair an athlete's performance. ANAHAD O'CONNOR

    New York Times

  • #2
    The way I've looked at it was that if having sex the night before really affected athletic preformance then I would think that after 8 hours of sleep you would be rejuvinated anyway.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Motion View Post
      THE BOTTOM LINE -- Sex does not impair an athlete's performance.
      I'll take the contrary notion that sex does impair an athlete's performance, especially if its too much before the main event.

      For example, lets say Mr.Triathlon gets together with his honey and spends an entire day gettin' busy. There's no way Mr.Triathlon will be able to perform the next day.

      Now if its just one or two times, there shouldn't be any problems.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tom Yum View Post
        I'll take the contrary notion that sex does impair an athlete's performance, especially if its too much before the main event.
        Could you say that about any physical activity? I'd think various other physical activities done before an athletic event could affect athletic performance. I mean does a person use up anymore energy jogging or running sprints in comparison to the amount used for sex?

        Comment


        • #5
          I can think of no BETTER way to warm up for competition. You know how you should break a sweat and maintain looseness in the muscles before a fight...start getting busy...kick some ass, and then come back and finish tapping ass. werd.

          Comment


          • #6
            Many coaches says that any action of this kind will lead to your waste.

            Are having the same opinion?

            Thanks

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Motion View Post
              Could you say that about any physical activity? I'd think various other physical activities done before an athletic event could affect athletic performance. I mean does a person use up anymore energy jogging or running sprints in comparison to the amount used for sex?
              Depends on the work profile of his workout:
              Lists calories burned running or jogging at various speeds and paces.


              A 195-lb person would burn 1594 kcals per hour running a 5:30 mile pace (sprinting). If calorie consumption is uniform per unit time, and he does 2 miles of sprint work (~10 minutes of work). He will burn a total of 1594/6 = 265 kcals.

              If that same person runs an 8 min mile pace for 7-8 miles (~1 hour of work) he will burn 1195 kcals.

              I read somewhere that foreplay + sex can burn up to 300 kcals per hour, so if you go for an hour or more yeah you could consume a great amount of energy and potentially wear yourself out before an event!
              Last edited by Tom Yum; 06-23-2007, 06:43 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tom Yum View Post
                I'll take the contrary notion that sex does impair an athlete's performance, especially if its too much before the main event.

                Nonsense, it's been proven that sexually frustrated fighters are 50% easier to knock out than well-sexed fighters. The same study also showed that 90% of all statistics on the internet were made up on the spot by the poster

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sagacious Lu View Post
                  Nonsense, it's been proven that sexually frustrated fighters are 50% easier to knock out than well-sexed fighters. The same study also showed that 90% of all statistics on the internet were made up on the spot by the poster
                  and only 82% of posters believe that....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tom Yum View Post
                    and only 82% of posters believe that....
                    what's the p score for that Null hypothesis compared to sigma?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Garland View Post
                      what's the p score for that Null hypothesis compared to sigma?
                      You get 1-sigma level confidence (~67%) for free.

                      To get 2-sigma (~95%) and higher I'll have to charge a fee...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tom Yum View Post
                        You get 1-sigma level confidence (~67%) for free.

                        To get 2-sigma (~95%) and higher I'll have to charge a fee...

                        Oh, psha...bust out my t-1 83...and so long as the P is over 30...I can assume it'll be close to a normal distibution, right?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Garland View Post
                          Oh, psha...bust out my t-1 83...and so long as the P is over 30...I can assume it'll be close to a normal distibution, right?
                          Sure, given the population size > 30 you could assume that the data points form a normal distribution. What type of data are we collecting? sex facts?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tom Yum View Post
                            Sure, given the population size > 30 you could assume that the data points form a normal distribution. What type of data are we collecting? sex facts?
                            I'm sure we could set up an expirement.

                            Null Hypothesis: .5 muay thai kickboxers do poorly after having sex compared to their normal mean.
                            Alternative Hypothesis (Claim): more than .5 muay thai kickboxers do poorly after having sex compared to their normal mean.

                            1) Take a sample of 60 thai kickboxers. (so you can repeat the expirement to verify data, 30 in each trial) all about the same age, fitness, and skill level.

                            2) Have them "serviced" prior to some sort of set, standardized way to measure performance, i.e. like the thai test, but just count how many kicks and knees they do in a set period of time...but on a heavy bag instead of having padholders (times could vary as the padholders get fatigued, as well as other human variables that would introduce error)

                            3) Collect discrete data, i.e. how many kicks and knees do they do when they have and haven't gotten laid.

                            4) Crunch #'s and write up a conclusion.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Garland View Post
                              I'm sure we could set up an expirement.

                              Null Hypothesis: .5 muay thai kickboxers do poorly after having sex compared to their normal mean.
                              Alternative Hypothesis (Claim): more than .5 muay thai kickboxers do poorly after having sex compared to their normal mean.

                              1) Take a sample of 60 thai kickboxers. (so you can repeat the expirement to verify data, 30 in each trial) all about the same age, fitness, and skill level.

                              2) Have them "serviced" prior to some sort of set, standardized way to measure performance, i.e. like the thai test, but just count how many kicks and knees they do in a set period of time...but on a heavy bag instead of having padholders (times could vary as the padholders get fatigued, as well as other human variables that would introduce error)

                              3) Collect discrete data, i.e. how many kicks and knees do they do when they have and haven't gotten laid.

                              4) Crunch #'s and write up a conclusion.
                              I totally agree with those.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X