Originally posted by jubaji
View Post
Again, you are not telling the truth and living up to your reputation in here. I really don't take you seriously in anything you say. I do have understanding about grappling and I have posted in another forum very clear defenses against different positions. Rear naked chokes, triangles, side mounts, etc etc.
Tell me a techniques that you think I cannot escape from, and I will try to show the Kung Fu answer to it. I may even post pictures. Try to use techniques that are common to Jujitsu and other grappling arts. And then we will see if I know about grappling and how to escape or defend against such attacks. I also want you to describe the attacking approach to doing this technique. By this I mean, how does the person approach me to get me into this position.
And by the way when I remind you that I have been involved in martial arts for over 20 years I do so to point out that a person can learn alot of things in that time. I did not just start martial arts a week ago and try to discuss techniques. I don't say this to boast, but to relate information in helping you understand my mindset and background.
As far as the test for anyone to do. Think of it like a homework assignment. If they do what I suggested as a test for escaping grapplers, they will find out, within about twenty seconds that they work. And if they think they may not do things as I would, I am just telling them to attack whatever way works for them. If they see an opening at the eyes or face attack it or the groin throat fingers etc. (but pull your techniques and be careful) . Think of all the so called "dirty fighting" things you can, and clawing attacks, etc. there some attacks i do not want to mention here because they are too dangerous. but even without these you can escape very quickly and gain control.Watch how fast the situation shift. Even a child, with no martial arts background should be able to understand what I am talking about and the simplicity of it. To argue and fight as some do shows their lack of sound self defense and that they just want to fight for any reason, no matter what I say.
I also find it very amusing that any person who claims to know martial arts at all, would even mock for a second at attacking the vital areas in combat. Or that they would try to say that what I showed would not work. They argue with me and the experts. I think they argue just because they are biased against me and they would fight against anything I said even if I gave the most solid fighting applications. Some are under the mistaken views that Kung Fu does not have a strong ground fighting arsenal. They are wrong. But with this view they have they will attack anyone who even tries to say or show the contrary.
Comment