Dear ITA Members,
I have recently discovered something that has prompted me to have a discouraging opinion of your organization.
The patterns you promote to teach (the Chon-Ji or Chang Hon patterns) are not as you say. The pattern set itself is lacking many of the patterns (mainly the longer more difficult patterns). Also, the patterns that remain are bastardized beyond recognition. Does the ITA use these patterns names in an attempt to gain credibility for their organization?
Feel free to create your own patterns and name them accordingly; however, I feel it greatly disrespectful to lie to your students. You are not teaching the patterns you claim to teach. This is not misrepresentation, this is a lie!
Please stop lying to your students...
h2o is water...h10 and h30 are not! Therefore, Chon-Ji with only 14 movements is not Chon-Ji!
TAEKWON!
Spookey
I have recently discovered something that has prompted me to have a discouraging opinion of your organization.
The patterns you promote to teach (the Chon-Ji or Chang Hon patterns) are not as you say. The pattern set itself is lacking many of the patterns (mainly the longer more difficult patterns). Also, the patterns that remain are bastardized beyond recognition. Does the ITA use these patterns names in an attempt to gain credibility for their organization?
Feel free to create your own patterns and name them accordingly; however, I feel it greatly disrespectful to lie to your students. You are not teaching the patterns you claim to teach. This is not misrepresentation, this is a lie!
Please stop lying to your students...
h2o is water...h10 and h30 are not! Therefore, Chon-Ji with only 14 movements is not Chon-Ji!
TAEKWON!
Spookey
Comment